首页> 外文期刊>Surgical innovation >Prospective study of ambulation after open and laparoscopic colorectal resection.
【24h】

Prospective study of ambulation after open and laparoscopic colorectal resection.

机译:开放性和腹腔镜结直肠切除术后的下床活动的前瞻性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: Open and laparoscopic surgical approaches each have specific advantages. This study compares ambulation, hospital length of stay (LOS), and incision length after open and laparoscopic colorectal resection. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing colorectal resection over a 2 year period ending August 2002 were followed prospectively. Ambulation, LOS, and incision length were recorded. Hybrid low anterior resection (LAR) patients had laparoscopic splenic flexure takedown, vessel ligation, and proximal rectal mobilization followed by planned inferior laparotomy to complete the case. Groups were compared using Student's t test. RESULTS: Equivalent open and laparoscopic groups were comparable in terms of gender, age, body mass index, ASA class, indication for operation, and resection performed. Seventy open colectomy patients were compared with 99 laparoscopic-assisted colectomy patients. On average, patients in the open and laparoscopic groups ambulated 67 and 390 feet, respectively, on postoperative day 1 (P < .001), 290 and 752 feet on day 2 (P < .001), and 495 and 965 feet on day 3 (P < .001). The average LOS in the open group was 9.3 days compared with 5.9 days in the laparoscopic group (P < .001). The average incision length in the open group was 19.7 cm compared with 5.3 cm in the laparoscopic group (P < .001). Seventeen open LAR patients were compared with 30 hybrid LAR patients. On average, patients in the open and hybrid groups ambulated 22 and 150 feet, respectively, on postoperative day 1 (P = .003), 105 and 433 feet on day 2 (P = .003), and 369 and 488 feet on day 3 (P = .43). The average LOS in the open group was 10 days compared with 8.5 days in the hybrid group (P = .46). The average incision length in the open group was 19.8 cm compared with 10.8 cm in the hybrid group (P < .001). When all 216 patients were considered, the 91 patients with incisions shorter than 8 cm (average 4.6 cm) ambulated 396, 752, and 956 feet on consecutive days whereas the 125 patients with incisions 8 cm or longer (average 16.9 cm, P < .001) ambulated 101, 334, and 521 feet on consecutive days (all P values <.001). Average LOS in the <8-cm group was 6 days compared with 8.9 days in the > or =8-cm group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing minimal-access colorectal surgery ambulated significantly further than equivalent open patients in the early postoperative period and had a shorter LOS.
机译:目的:开放式和腹腔镜手术方法各有其特殊优势。本研究比较了开放式和腹腔镜结肠直肠切除术后的步行,住院时间(LOS)和切口长度。方法:对截至2002年8月的2年内接受大肠切除术的所有连续患者进行前瞻性随访。记录步行,LOS和切口长度。混合型低位前路切除术(LAR)患者经腹腔镜脾曲曲切除术,血管结扎术和直肠近端动员,然后计划进行下腹剖腹手术以完成病例。使用学生t检验比较各组。结果:等效的开放组和腹腔镜组在性别,年龄,体重指数,ASA等级,手术指征和手术切除方面具有可比性。将70例开放结肠切除术患者与99例腹腔镜辅助结肠切除术患者进行比较。平均而言,开腹组和腹腔镜组的患者在术后第1天分别行走67英尺和390英尺(P <.001),在第2天行走290和752英尺(P <.001),以及每天495和965英尺。 3(P <.001)。开放组的平均LOS为9.3天,而腹腔镜组为5.9天(P <.001)。开放组的平均切口长度为19.7 cm,而腹腔镜组为5.3 cm(P <.001)。将17名开放LAR患者与30名混合LAR患者进行比较。平均而言,开放组和混合组的患者在术后第1天的步态分别为22英尺和150英尺(P = 0.003),在第2天的患者为10​​5英尺和433英尺(P = 0.003)以及每天的369英尺和488英尺。 3(P = .43)。开放组的平均LOS为10天,而混合组为8.5天(P = 0.46)。开放组的平均切口长度为19.8 cm,而混合组为10.8 cm(P <.001)。当考虑所有216例患者时,连续时间短于8厘米(平均4.6厘米)的91例患者连续396英尺,752英尺和956英尺,而125例8厘米或更长的患者(平均16.9厘米,P <)。 001)在连续的几天内走动101、334和521英尺(所有P值均<.001)。 <8-cm组的平均LOS为6天,而>或= 8-cm组的平均LOS为8.9天(P <.001)。结论:在术后早期,接受最小限度结直肠外科手术的患者比同等开放患者的行走能力显着提高,并且LOS较短。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号