首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >The feasibility and accuracy of diagnostic laparoscopy in the septic ICU patient.
【24h】

The feasibility and accuracy of diagnostic laparoscopy in the septic ICU patient.

机译:在脓毒症ICU患者中进行腹腔镜诊断的可行性和准确性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis of unknown origin are common complications of critically ill patients in the ICU. These patients frequently have unreliable clinical exams and are candidates for exploratory laparotomy. Although abdominal CT is commonly used because it is less invasive than laparotomy, it is often unreliable or unobtainable. Bedside laparoscopy is an alternative technique that may be more accurate than CT in selected patients and less invasive than laparotomy. METHODS: We performed diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) in a series of ICU patients with SIRS/septic state of unknown origin between May 1997 and June 1998. All patients were unstable and required significant respiratory and hemodynamic support. Laparoscopy was either performed in the ICU at the patient's bedside or in the operating room. CT scan of the abdomen had been performed on most of the patients who were stable enough to transport. Confirmation of diagnosis was obtained either by laparotomy, autopsy, or clinical recovery. RESULTS: Among the 17 eligible patients, 16 underwent successful DL. Insufflation was impossible in one patient because of high intraabdominal pressure. Bedside evaluations were performed in 14 of the 17 patients. There were no complications from the laparoscopy. Six patients were identified as positive (four intestinal ischemia, two cholecystitis); the other 10 had negative explorations. Follow-up on two patients with negative laparoscopy was incomplete due to denied postmortem. Laparoscopic diagnoses were confirmed in the remaining 14 patients by laparotomy (six cases), postmortem (three cases), or recovery (five cases), with an accuracy of 100%. The overall accuracy of abdominal CT obtained in nine of the 14 patients was 33%. CONCLUSIONS: DL in a select group of critical ICU patients is safe and accurate, whereas CT scan tends to be inaccurate and is often unobtainable due to patient instability. Performing the procedure at the bedside can expedite the diagnosis, eliminate the burden for transfer, and save on anesthesia and operating room charges.
机译:背景:系统性炎症反应综合征(SIRS)和不明败血症是重症监护病房中危重患者的常见并发症。这些患者经常进行不可靠的临床检查,是探索性剖腹手术的候选人。尽管通常使用腹部CT是因为它比开腹手术的侵入性小,但通常不可靠或无法获得。床旁腹腔镜检查是一种替代技术,在选定的患者中可能比CT准确,并且比剖腹手术的侵入性小。方法:我们在1997年5月至1998年6月之间,对ICU合并SIRS /脓毒症状态不明的ICU患者进行了诊断性腹腔镜检查(DL)。所有患者不稳定,需要大量的呼吸和血液动力学支持。腹腔镜检查在患者床旁的ICU或手术室中进行。大多数稳定到可以运输的患者都进行了腹部CT扫描。通过开腹手术,尸检或临床康复获得诊断确认。结果:在17例合格患者中,有16例成功进行了DL。一名患者由于腹腔内高压而无法吹气。在17名患者中的14名患者中进行了床旁评估。腹腔镜检查无并发症。确认6例为阳性(4例肠缺血,2例胆囊炎)。其他10个人有负面探索。由于死后检查被拒绝,对两名腹腔镜检查阴性患者的随访不完整。其余14例患者均通过剖腹术(6例),死后(3例)或康复(5例)进行了腹腔镜诊断,准确性为100%。 14例患者中有9例获得的腹部CT总体准确率为33%。结论:在一组重症ICU患者中,DL是安全,准确的,而CT扫描往往不准确,并且由于患者的不稳定性而常常无法获得。在床边执行该程序可以加快诊断速度,消除转移的负担,并节省麻醉和手术室费用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号