首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: predictors of successful outcome in patients who fail endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
【24h】

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: predictors of successful outcome in patients who fail endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

机译:内镜超声引导胆道引流与经皮肝穿刺胆道引流:内镜逆行胰胆管造影失败的患者成功预后的预测指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Patients with failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are conventionally offered percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). While PTBD is effective, it is associated with catheter-related complications, pain, and poor quality of life. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is a minimally invasive endoscopic option increasingly offered as an alternative to PTBD. We compare outcomes of EUS-BD and PTBD in patients with biliary obstruction at a single tertiary care center.
机译:常规向内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)失败的患者提供经皮经肝胆道引流术(PTBD)。 PTBD有效,但与导管相关的并发症,疼痛和生活质量差有关。内窥镜超声引导胆汁引流术(EUS-BD)是一种微创内窥镜检查方法,越来越多地用作PTBD的替代方法。我们在一个三级护理中心比较了胆道梗阻患者的EUS-BD和PTBD结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号