...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: A retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy
【24h】

Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: A retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy

机译:机器人辅助括约肌切除术治疗低位直肠癌的近期临床疗效:与常规腹腔镜检查的回顾性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: A robotic system (da Vinci? Surgical System, Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) has technical advantages over conventional laparoscopic surgery because it increases the precision and accuracy of anatomical dissection. The present study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes between robot-assisted intersphincteric resection (ISR) and laparoscopic ISR for distal rectal cancer. Methods: Patients who underwent robot- or laparoscopy-assisted ISR for rectal cancer between March 2008 and July 2011 were included in this retrospective comparative study. Perioperative and postoperative data, including complications and early functional outcomes, were analyzed between the two groups. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Wexner scoring system, the International Prostate Symptom Score, and the 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function. Results: A total of 40 patients underwent robot-assisted and 40 underwent laparoscopic ISR. The mean operative time was significantly longer in the robotic group than in the laparoscopic group (235.5 vs. 185.4 min; p 0.001). Transabdominal ISR, in which intersphincteric dissection is completed in the pelvic cavity, was performed more with robotic assistance than with laparoscopic surgery (8 vs. 2 cases; p = 0.043). No difference was observed between groups regarding postoperative morbidity and pathological outcomes. The robot-assisted group showed a trend toward less postoperative blood loss and early recovery of functional outcomes. Conclusion: Robot-assisted surgery was safe and effective for ISR of distal rectal cancer and showed surgical outcomes similar to those of the latest laparoscopic ISR. The favorable results of the robot-assisted ISR included reduced adaptation time, alleviated difficulty of perineal phase, and early recovery of functional outcomes in this analysis of short-term clinical outcomes.
机译:背景:机器人系统(达芬奇手术系统,美国加利福尼亚州桑尼维尔的直觉外科公司)比传统的腹腔镜手术具有技术优势,因为它提高了解剖解剖的准确性和准确性。本研究旨在比较远端直肠癌的机器人辅助括约肌切除术(ISR)和腹腔镜ISR之间的短期结果。方法:该回顾性比较研究纳入了在2008年3月至2011年7月之间接受了机器人或腹腔镜辅助ISR治疗的直肠癌患者。在两组之间分析围手术期和术后数据,包括并发症和早期功能结局。使用Wexner评分系统,国际前列腺症状评分和国际勃起功能指数的5个项目来评估功能结局。结果:总共40例患者接受了机器人辅助治疗,其中40例接受了腹腔镜ISR治疗。与腹腔镜手术组相比,机器人组的平均手术时间明显更长(235.5 vs. 185.4 min; p <0.001)。与腹腔镜手术相比,在机器人辅助下完成经腹腔ISR(其中在盆腔内完成括约肌间夹层清扫术)(8 vs. 2例; p = 0.043)。两组之间在术后发病率和病理结果方面没有差异。机器人辅助组显示出减少术后失血和早期功能恢复的趋势。结论:机器人辅助手术对远端直肠癌的ISR安全有效,其手术结果与最新的腹腔镜ISR相似。在短期临床结果分析中,机器人辅助ISR的良好结果包括缩短了适应时间,减轻了会阴期的困难以及功能恢复较早。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号