首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Can early laparoscopic cholecystectomy be the optimal management of cholecystitis with gallbladder perforation? A single institute experience of 74 cases
【24h】

Can early laparoscopic cholecystectomy be the optimal management of cholecystitis with gallbladder perforation? A single institute experience of 74 cases

机译:早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术能否成为胆囊穿孔性胆囊炎的最佳治疗方法?一个机构的74例经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Gallbladder perforation is a rare but serious complication of cholecystitis. It was usually managed by percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) followed by elective cholecystectomy. However, evidences are emerging that early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is still feasible under these conditions. We hypothesized that early LC may have comparable surgical results as to those of PTGBD + elective LC. Material and methods: From January 2005 to October 2011, patients admitted to China Medical University Hospital with a diagnosis of perforated cholecystitis were retrospectively reviewed. The diagnosis of gallbladder perforation was made by image and/or intraoperative findings. Those patients who had unstable hemodynamics that were not fitted for general anesthesia or those who had concomitant major operations were excluded. Patients were divided into three groups: early open cholecystectomy (group 1), early LC (group 2), and PTGBDfollowed by elective LC (group 3). The demographic features, surgical results, and patient outcome were analyzed and compared between groups. Results: A total of 74 patients were included. All patients had similar demographic features except that patients in group 2 were younger (62 vs. 72 and 73.5 years) compared with group 1 and group 3 (p = 0.016). There were no differences in terms of operative time, blood loss, conversion, and complication rate between three groups. The length of hospital stay (LOS) was significant shorter in group 2 patients compared with that of groups 1 and 3. Conclusions: Although PTGBD followed by elective LC was still the mainstay for the treatment of gallbladder perforation, early LC had comparable surgical outcomes as that of PTGBD + LC but with a significantly shorter LOS. Early LC should be considered the optimal treatment for gallbladder perforation, and PTGBD + LC can be preserved for those who carried a high risk of operation.
机译:背景:胆囊穿孔是胆囊炎的一种罕见但严重的并发症。通常通过经皮胆囊引流术(PTGBD),然后进行择期胆囊切除术来治疗。但是,越来越多的证据表明,在这些情况下早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)仍然可行。我们假设早期LC的手术效果与PTGBD +选择性LC的效果相当。材料与方法:自2005年1月至2011年10月,对中国医科大学附属医院确诊为穿孔性胆囊炎的患者进行回顾性检查。胆囊穿孔的诊断是根据影像学和/或术中发现。血液动力学不稳定且不适合全身麻醉的患者或同时进行大手术的患者被排除在外。将患者分为三组:早期开腹胆囊切除术(第1组),早期LC(第2组)和PTGBD,然后进行选择性LC(第3组)。分析人口统计学特征,手术结果和患者预后,并在各组之间进行比较。结果:共纳入74例患者。所有患者均具有相似的人口统计学特征,只是与第1组和第3组相比,第2组的患者更年轻(62岁,分别为72岁和73.5岁)(p = 0.016)。三组的手术时间,失血量,转换率和并发症发生率无差异。与第1组和第3组相比,第2组患者的住院时间(LOS)明显短。结论:尽管PTGBD继发择期LC仍是胆囊穿孔治疗的主要手段,但早期LC的手术结局与PTGBD + LC,但LOS明显缩短。早期LC应被认为是胆囊穿孔的最佳治疗方法,PTGBD + LC对于高风险手术者可以保留。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号