...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Impact of a bladder scan protocol on discharge efficiency within a care pathway for ambulatory inguinal herniorraphy
【24h】

Impact of a bladder scan protocol on discharge efficiency within a care pathway for ambulatory inguinal herniorraphy

机译:膀胱扫描方案对门诊腹股沟疝气护理路径内排出效率的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication of ambulatory inguinal herniorraphy, with an incidence reaching 38 %, and many surgeons require patients to void before discharge. This study aimed to assess whether the implementation of a bladder scan-based voiding protocol reduces the time until discharge after ambulatory inguinal herniorraphy without increasing the rate of POUR. Methods: As part of a perioperative care pathway, a protocol was implemented to standardize decision making after elective inguinal hernia repair (February 2012). Patients were assessed with a bladder scan, and those with <600 mL of urine were discharged home, whereas those with more than 600 mL of urine had an in-and-out catheterization before discharge. The patients received written information about urinary symptoms and instructions to present to the emergency department if they were unable to void at home. An audit of scheduled outpatient inguinal hernia repairs between October 2011 and July 2012 was performed. Comparisons were made using the t test, Fisher's exact test, and Wilcoxon rank sum test where appropriate. Statistical significance was defined a priori as a p value lower than 0.05. Results: During the study period, 124 patients underwent hernia repair: 60 before and 64 after implementation of the protocol. The findings showed no significant differences in patient characteristics, laparoscopic approach (35 vs. 33 %; p = 0.80), proportion receiving general anesthesia (70 vs. 73 %; p = 0.67), or amount of intravenous fluids given (793 vs. 663 mL; p = 0.07). The proportion of patients voiding before discharge was higher after protocol implementation (73 vs. 89 %; p = 0.02). The protocol had no impact on median time to discharge (190 vs. 205 min; p = 0.60). Only one patient in each group presented to the emergency department with POUR (2 %). Conclusion: After ambulatory inguinal herniorraphy, implementation of a bladder scan-based voiding protocol did not result in earlier discharge. The incidence of POUR was lower than reported in the literature.
机译:背景:术后尿retention留(POUR)是门诊腹股沟疝的常见并发症,发生率达38%,许多外科医生要求患者出院前排空。这项研究旨在评估基于膀胱扫描的排尿协议的实施是否可减少非活动性腹股沟疝气治疗后直至出院的时间,而不会增加POUR的发生率。方法:作为围手术期护理途径的一部分,实施了一项协议,以标准化择期腹股沟疝修补术后的决策(2012年2月)。对患者进行了膀胱扫描检查,尿液<600 mL的患者被送回家中,而尿液量超过600 mL的患者则在出院前进行内插式导管插入术。如果患者无法在家中排尿,他们会收到有关泌尿症状的书面信息以及向急诊科就诊的说明。对2011年10月至2012年7月门诊腹股沟疝修补术进行了审核。在适当的情况下,使用t检验,Fisher精确检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验进行比较。先验定义统计学意义为p值低于0.05。结果:在研究期间,有124例患者接受了疝气修补:实施方案之前60例,之后64例。研究结果显示,患者的特征,腹腔镜方式(35%vs. 33%; p = 0.80),接受全身麻醉的比例(70%vs. 73%; p = 0.67)或静脉输液量(793 vs. 0%)无显着差异。 663mL; p = 0.07)。实施方案后出院前排尿的患者比例更高(73比89%; p = 0.02)。该方案对中位放电时间没有影响(190比205分钟; p = 0.60)。每组中只有一名患者向PUR急诊室求诊(2%)。结论:动态腹股沟疝气治疗后,基于膀胱扫描的排尿协议的实施并未导致较早出院。 POUR的发生率低于文献报道。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号