首页> 外文期刊>Studies in the History of Gardens & Designed Landscapes >Architecture in Ji Cheng's The Craft of Gardens: a visual study of the role of representation in counteracting the influence of the pictorial idea in Chinesescholar gardens of the Ming period
【24h】

Architecture in Ji Cheng's The Craft of Gardens: a visual study of the role of representation in counteracting the influence of the pictorial idea in Chinesescholar gardens of the Ming period

机译:纪成《花园的手工艺》中的建筑:视觉研究表征在抵消明代中国学者花园中绘画观念的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Making, for Plato, is poesis on its own behalf. However, the making that takes place in the context of Chinese garden culture may differ from Plato's original conception of poetic thinking. Founded on a non-material attachment to beauty, Chinese gardens are typically structured around the dominating feature of the pictorial idea (huayi 畫意), which aims to evoke imagined affections that are beyond physical touch and tangible encounters. Following this principle, the Chinese scholar gardens are thought to define a type of bodily experience that intertwines mind and image, and therefore to be subject to an aesthetic that is identical to that of scholarly landscape paintings or, in other words, the pictorial idea of the garden. Accordingly, this pictorial aesthetic appears to suppress the corporeal operation of the eye to some extent. This is evident in the gardens of the Qing Dynasty (1644—1912), whose symbolism came to replace the naturalistic aesthetic that had dominated painting since the time ofEmperor Huitsung (1082-1135). That is, the depiction of Qing garden space no longer aimed to reflect its physical form but presented poetic themes with the help of literal interpretation. The neo-Confucian ideology of the late Ming period (1368— 1644)further emphasized this association in promoting the dominance of 'thinking' over the 'making' of tangible things. In this regard, the representational sense of the garden is challenged by a pure mental image withtranscendental meaning. According to most of the contemporary scholarship on Chinese gardens, the actual image of the typical scholarly garden never seems to be in accordance with the making of the garden space.
机译:对于柏拉图而言,制造本身就是诗意。但是,在中国园林文化背景下进行的创作可能与柏拉图的诗意思维原始概念不同。中国园林建立在对美的非物质依附上,通常围绕着绘画意念(huayi画意)的主要特征构建,该意念旨在唤起想象中的情感,这些情感超出了实际的接触和实际的相遇。遵循这一原则,中国​​学者园林被定义为一种将思想和图像交织在一起的身体体验,因此要受到与学术山水画或换句话说的绘画意念相同的审美。花园。因此,这种图形美学似乎在某种程度上抑制了眼睛的有形操作。这在清代(1644–1912)的花园中就显而易见了,清代的花园象征主义取代了自慧星皇帝(1082-1​​135年)以来主导绘画的自然主义美学。就是说,对清园林空间的描绘不再旨在反映其物理形式,而是借助文字解释来呈现诗意主题。明末期(1368-1644年)的新儒家意识形态进一步强调了这种联系,以促进“思考”对有形事物“制造”的主导。在这方面,花园的代表性感受到具有超越意义的纯粹心理形象的挑战。根据当代有关中国园林的大多数学术研究,典型的学术园林的实际形象似乎与园林空间的形成并不一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号