首页> 外文期刊>Statistics in medicine >Empirical Bayes estimation of the selected treatment mean for two-stage drop-the-loser trials: A meta-analytic approach
【24h】

Empirical Bayes estimation of the selected treatment mean for two-stage drop-the-loser trials: A meta-analytic approach

机译:两阶段失败者试验的所选治疗均值的经验贝叶斯估计:一种荟萃分析方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Point estimation for the selected treatment in a two-stage drop-the-loser trial is not straightforward because a substantial bias can be induced in the standard maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) through the first stage selection process. Research has generally focused on alternative estimation strategies that apply a bias correction to the MLE; however, such estimators can have a large mean squared error. Carreras and Brannath (Stat. Med. 32:1677-90) have recently proposed using a special form of shrinkage estimation in this context. Given certain assumptions, their estimator is shown to dominate the MLE in terms of mean squared error loss, which provides a very powerful argument for its use in practice. In this paper, we suggest the use of a more general form of shrinkage estimation in drop-the-loser trials that has parallels with model fitting in the area of meta-analysis. Several estimators are identified and are shown to perform favourably to Carreras and Brannath's original estimator and the MLE. However, they necessitate either explicit estimation of an additional parameter measuring the heterogeneity between treatment effects or a quite unnatural prior distribution for the treatment effects that can only be specified after the first stage data has been observed. Shrinkage methods are a powerful tool for accurately quantifying treatment effects in multi-arm clinical trials, and further research is needed to understand how to maximise their utility.
机译:在两阶段失败者试验中,针对所选治疗的点估计并不简单,因为在第一阶段的选择过程中,标准最大似然估计(MLE)可能会引起实质性偏差。研究通常集中在对MLE进行偏差校正的替代估计策略上。但是,这样的估计量可能具有较大的均方误差。 Carreras and Brannath(Stat。Med。32:1677-90)最近提出了在这种情况下使用一种特殊形式的收缩估计。给定某些假设,就均方误差损失而言,它们的估计值显示出优于MLE,这为其在实践中的使用提供了非常有力的论据。在本文中,我们建议在失败者试验中使用更通用的收缩率估算形式,该模型与荟萃分析领域中的模型拟合具有相似性。确定了几个估算器,并显示出它们对Carreras和Brannath的原始估算器以及MLE的支持良好。但是,他们必须要么明确估计测量治疗效果之间异质性的附加参数,要么必须在观察到第一阶段数据后才能确定治疗效果的非常不自然的先验分布。收缩方法是在多臂临床试验中准确量化治疗效果的强大工具,需要进一步研究以了解如何最大程度地发挥其效用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号