首页> 外文期刊>Statistics in medicine >Bayesian meta-analytical methods to incorporate multiple surrogate endpoints in drug development process
【24h】

Bayesian meta-analytical methods to incorporate multiple surrogate endpoints in drug development process

机译:贝叶斯荟萃分析方法将多个替代终点纳入药物开发过程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A number of meta-analytical methods have been proposed that aim to evaluate surrogate endpoints. Bivariate meta-analytical methods can be used to predict the treatment effect for the final outcome from the treatment effect estimate measured on the surrogate endpoint while taking into account the uncertainty around the effect estimate for the surrogate endpoint. In this paper, extensions to multivariate models are developed aiming to include multiple surrogate endpoints with the potential benefit of reducing the uncertainty when making predictions. In this Bayesian multivariate meta-analytic framework, the between-study variability is modelled in a formulation of a product of normal univariate distributions. This formulation is particularly convenient for including multiple surrogate endpoints and flexible for modelling the outcomes which can be surrogate endpoints to the final outcome and potentially to one another. Two models are proposed, first, using an unstructured between-study covariance matrix by assuming the treatment effects on all outcomes are correlated and second, using a structured between-study covariance matrix by assuming treatment effects on some of the outcomes are conditionally independent. While the two models are developed for the summary data on a study level, the individual-level association is taken into account by the use of the Prentice's criteria (obtained from individual patient data) to inform the within study correlations in the models. The modelling techniques are investigated using an example in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis where the disability worsening is the final outcome, while relapse rate and MRI lesions are potential surrogates to the disability progression. (C) 2015 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
机译:已经提出了许多旨在评估替代终点的荟萃分析方法。双变量荟萃分析方法可用于根据在替代终点上测得的治疗效果估计值预测最终结果的治疗效果,同时考虑到围绕替代终点的效果估计值的不确定性。在本文中,多变量模型的扩展旨在包括多个代理端点,从而具有潜在的好处,即在进行预测时可以减少不确定性。在此贝叶斯多元荟萃分析框架中,研究之间的可变性以正态单变量分布乘积的公式表示。这种表述对于包括多个替代终点特别方便,并且可以灵活地模拟可能是最终终点和潜在终点的替代终点的结果。提出了两个模型,首先,通过假设对所有结局的治疗效果相关,使用非结构化研究之间的协方差矩阵;其次,通过假设对某些结局的治疗效果,使用结构化的研究之间的协方差矩阵。虽然为研究级别的汇总数据开发了两种模型,但通过使用Prentice的标准(从个体患者数据中获得)来考虑个体级别的关联,以告知模型中的研究内部相关性。使用复发性多发性硬化症中的一个例子研究了建模技术,其中残疾恶化是最终结果,而复发率和MRI病变是残疾进展的潜在替代物。 (C)2015作者。 John Wiley&Sons Ltd.发布的医学统计资料。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号