...
首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary clinical trials >Does the decision in a validation process of a surrogate endpoint change with level of significance of treatment effect? A proposal on validation of surrogate endpoints.
【24h】

Does the decision in a validation process of a surrogate endpoint change with level of significance of treatment effect? A proposal on validation of surrogate endpoints.

机译:替代终点的验证过程中的决定是否随治疗效果的显着性水平而变化?关于验证替代端点的建议。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: In recent years the use of surrogate end points (S) has become an interesting issue. In clinical trials, it is important to get treatment outcomes as early as possible. For this reason there is a need for surrogate endpoints (S) which are measured earlier than the true endpoint (T). However, before a surrogate endpoint can be used it must be validated. For a candidate surrogate endpoint, for example time to recurrence, the validation result may change dramatically between clinical trials. The aim of this study is to show how the validation criterion (R(2)(trial)) proposed by Buyse et al. are influenced by the magnitude of treatment effect with an application using real data. METHODS: The criterion R(2)(trial) proposed by Buyse et al. (2000) is applied to the four data sets from colon cancer clinical trials (C-01, C-02, C-03 and C-04). Each clinical trial is analyzed separately for treatment effect on survival (true endpoint) and recurrence free survival (surrogate endpoint) and this analysis is done also for each center in each trial. Results are used for standard validation analysis. The centers were grouped by the Wald statistic in 3 equal groups. RESULTS: Validation criteria R(2)(trial) were 0.641 95% CI (0.432-0.782), 0.223 95% CI (0.008-0.503), 0.761 95% CI (0.550-0.872) and 0.560 95% CI (0.404-0.687) for C-01, C-02, C-03 and C-04 respectively. The R(2)(trial) criteria changed by the Wald statistics observed for the centers used in the validation process. Higher the Wald statistic groups are higher the R(2)(trial) values observed. CONCLUSION: The recurrence free survival is not a good surrogate for overall survival in clinical trials with non significant treatment effects and moderate for significant treatment effects. This shows that the level of significance of treatment effect should be taken into account in validation process of surrogate endpoints.
机译:背景:近年来,替代终点(S)的使用已成为一个有趣的问题。在临床试验中,重要的是尽早获得治疗结果。由于这个原因,需要替代端点(S),其早于真实端点(T)被测量。但是,在可以使用代理端点之前,必须先对其进行验证。对于候选替代终点(例如复发时间),验证结果在临床试验之间可能会发生巨大变化。这项研究的目的是展示Buyse等人提出的验证标准(R(2)(trial))。使用实际数据的应用程序会受到治疗效果大小的影响。方法:Buyse等人提出的标准R(2)(试验)。 (2000年)适用于来自结肠癌临床试验的四个数据集(C-01,C-02,C-03和C-04)。分别分析每个临床试验的生存期(真实终点)和无复发生存期(替代终点)的治疗效果,并且每个试验中的每个中心也进行此分析。结果用于标准验证分析。根据Wald统计量将中心分为3个相等的组。结果:验证标准R(2)(试验)为0.641 95%CI(0.432-0.782),0.223 95%CI(0.008-0.503),0.761 95%CI(0.550-0.872)和0.560 95%CI(0.404-0.687) )分别用于C-01,C-02,C-03和C-04。 R(2)(试验)标准因Wald统计数据而发生了变化,该统计数据是针对验证过程中使用的中心观察到的。 Wald统计组越高,观察到的R(2)(trial)值越高。结论:在无显着治疗效果的中度无显着疗效的临床试验中,无复发生存率并不是整体生存的良好替代指标。这表明在替代终点的验证过程中应考虑治疗效果的显着性水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号