首页> 外文期刊>Statistics in medicine >Multicollinearity in prognostic factor analyses using the EORTC QLQ-C30: identification and impact on model selection.
【24h】

Multicollinearity in prognostic factor analyses using the EORTC QLQ-C30: identification and impact on model selection.

机译:使用EORTC QLQ-C30在预后因素分析中的多重共线性:识别及其对模型选择的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Clinical and quality of life (QL) variables from an EORTC clinical trial of first line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer were used in a prognostic factor analysis of survival and response to chemotherapy. For response, different final multivariate models were obtained from forward and backward selection methods, suggesting a disconcerting instability. Quality of life was measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire completed by patients. Subscales on the questionnaire are known to be highly correlated, and therefore it was hypothesized that multicollinearity contributed to model instability. A correlation matrix indicated that global QL was highly correlated with 7 out of 11 variables. In a first attempt to explore multicollinearity, we used global QL as dependent variable in a regression model with other QL subscales as predictors. Afterwards, standard diagnostic tests for multicollinearity were performed. An exploratory principal components analysis and factor analysis of the QL subscales identified at most three important components and indicated that inclusion of global QL made minimal difference to the loadings on each component, suggesting that it is redundant in the model. In a second approach, we advocate a bootstrap technique to assess the stability of the models. Based on these analyses and since global QL exacerbates problems of multicollinearity, we therefore recommend that global QL be excluded from prognostic factor analyses using the QLQ-C30. The prognostic factor analysis was rerun without global QL in the model, and selected the same significant prognostic factors as before.
机译:来自晚期乳腺癌一线化疗的EORTC临床试验的临床和生活质量(QL)变量用于生存率和对化疗的反应的预后因素分析中。为了进行响应,从正向和反向选择方法中获得了不同的最终多元模型,这表明令人不安的不稳定因素。使用患者填写的EORTC QLQ-C30问卷测量生活质量。已知问卷中的子量表是高度相关的,因此可以假设多重共线性导致模型不稳定。相关矩阵表明,全局QL与11个变量中的7个高度相关。在探索多重共线性的首次尝试中,我们将全局QL作为回归模型中的因变量,以其他QL子量表作为预测变量。之后,进行了多重共线性的标准诊断测试。对QL分量表进行的探索性主成分分析和因子分析确定了最多三个重要成分,并表明,将全局QL包含在内对每个成分的负载影响最小,这表明该模型是多余的。在第二种方法中,我们提倡使用自举技术来评估模型的稳定性。基于这些分析,并且由于全局QL加剧了多重共线性问题,因此,我们建议使用QLQ-C30将全局QL排除在预后因素分析之外。在模型中没有全局QL的情况下重新运行预后因素分析,并选择与以前相同的重要预后因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号