...
首页> 外文期刊>Strahlentherapie und Onkologie >Radiotherapy for brain metastases from renal cell cancer: should whole-brain radiotherapy be added to stereotactic radiosurgery?: analysis of 88 patients.
【24h】

Radiotherapy for brain metastases from renal cell cancer: should whole-brain radiotherapy be added to stereotactic radiosurgery?: analysis of 88 patients.

机译:肾细胞癌脑转移的放射治疗:立体定向放射外科手术应加全脑放射治疗吗?:分析88例患者。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for the treatment of brain metastases in patients with renal cell cancer (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 88 patients were treated with either SRS (n = 51) or SRS + WBRT (n = 17) for one to three lesions, or with WBRT (n = 20) for more than three brain metastases. Overall survival (OS), intracerebral control (IC) and local control (LC) were retrospectively analyzed. Six potential prognostic factors were assessed: age, gender, number of brain metastases, extracerebral metastases, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class, and interval from tumor diagnosis to irradiation. RESULTS: The median times for OS, IC, and LC from the time of diagnosis were 11, 9, and 10 months. The median OS times for SRS, SRS + WBRT, and WBRT were 12, 16, and 2 months. Addition of WBRT to the SRS improved IC (p = 0.032) but not OS (p = 0.703). On multivariate analyses, improved OS was associated with the absence of extracerebral metastases (p < 0.001) and RPA class (p = 0.04), and IC with treatment (p = 0.019). SRS provided a 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year LC probability of 81%, 78%, and 55%, respectively. No association between LC and any of the potential prognostic factors was observed. The results of the subgroup analyses, regarding treatment modality, were similar to the entire cohort, particularly for RPA class I patients. CONCLUSION: Addition of WBRT to SRS offers better IC and should be considered for RCC patients with one to three brain metastases, especially in RPA class I group. SRS offers excellent LC rates, while WBRT should be reserved for patients with multiple metastases and poor prognosis.
机译:目的:评估立体定向放射外科(SRS)和全脑放射治疗(WBRT)在肾细胞癌(RCC)患者脑转移治疗中的作用。患者与方法:88例患者接受了SRS(n = 51)或SRS + WBRT(n = 17)治疗一到三个病变,或使用WBRT(n = 20)治疗了三个以上的脑转移。回顾性分析了总生存期(OS),脑内对照(IC)和局部对照(LC)。评估了六个潜在的预后因素:年龄,性别,脑转移瘤的数量,脑外转移瘤,递归分区分析(RPA)类以及从肿瘤诊断到放疗的间隔时间。结果:自诊断之日起OS,IC和LC的中位时间为11、9和10个月。 SRS,SRS + WBRT和WBRT的平均OS时间为12个月,16个月和2个月。将WBRT添加到SRS可以改善IC(p = 0.032),但不能改善OS(p = 0.703)。在多变量分析中,OS改善与无脑外转移(p <0.001)和RPA类(p = 0.04)以及IC治疗(p = 0.019)相关。 SRS提供的1年,2年和3年LC概率分别为81%,78%和55%。没有观察到LC和任何潜在的预后因素之间的关联。关于治疗方式的亚组分析结果与整个队列相似,特别是对于RPA I类患者。结论:在SRS上加WBRT可以提供更好的IC,因此,对于有1-3个脑转移的RCC患者,尤其是RPA I类患者,应考虑使用WBRT。 SRS可提供出色的LC率,而WBRT应该保留给多发转移和预后不良的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号