首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics >A matched-pair analysis comparing whole-brain radiotherapy plus stereotactic radiosurgery versus surgery plus whole-brain radiotherapy and a boost to the metastatic site for one or two brain metastases.
【24h】

A matched-pair analysis comparing whole-brain radiotherapy plus stereotactic radiosurgery versus surgery plus whole-brain radiotherapy and a boost to the metastatic site for one or two brain metastases.

机译:配对分析比较全脑放疗加立体定向放射外科与手术加全脑放疗以及对一到两个脑转移的转移部位的增强作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the results of whole-brain radiotherapy plus stereotactic radiosurgery (WBRT+SRS) with those of surgery plus whole-brain radiotherapy and a boost to the metastatic site (OP+WBRT+boost) for patients with one or two brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Survival, intracerebral control, and local control of the treated metastases were retrospectively evaluated. To reduce the risk of selection bias, a matched-pair analysis was performed. The outcomes of 47 patients who received WBRT+SRS were compared with those of a second cohort of 47 patients who recieved OP+WBRT+boost. The two treatment groups were matched for the following potential prognostic factors: WBRT schedule, age, gender, performance status, tumor type, number of brain metastases, extracerebral metastases, recursive partitioning analysis class, and interval from tumor diagnosis to WBRT. RESULTS: The 1-year survival rates were 65% after WBRT+SRS and 63% after OP+WBRT+boost (p = 0.19). The 1-year intracerebral control rateswere 70% and 78% (p = 0.39), respectively. The 1-year local control rates were 84% and 83% (p = 0.87), respectively. On multivariate analyses, improved survival was significantly associated with better performance status (p = 0.009), no extracerebral metastases (p = 0.004), recursive partitioning analysis Class 1 (p = 0.004), and interval from tumor diagnosis to WBRT (p = 0.001). Intracerebral control was not significantly associated with any of the potential prognostic factors. Improved local control was significantly associated with no extracerebral metastases (p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment outcomes were not significantly different after WBRT+SRS compared with OP+WBRT+boost. However, WBRT+SRS is less invasive than OP+WBRT+boost and may be preferable for patients with one or two brain metastases. The results should be confirmed by randomized trials.
机译:目的:比较全脑放疗加立体定向放射手术(WBRT + SRS)与手术加全脑放疗的结果,以及有一个或两个脑转移的患者转移部位(OP + WBRT + boost)的增强作用。方法和材料:回顾性评估了治疗转移灶的生存,脑内控制和局部控制。为了降低选择偏见的风险,进行了配对分析。将47例接受WBRT + SRS的患者的结局与第二组47例接受OP + WBRT + boost的患者的结局进行了比较。将两个治疗组的以下潜在预后因素进行了匹配:WBRT时间表,年龄,性别,机能状态,肿瘤类型,脑转移瘤数量,脑外转移瘤,递归分区分析类别以及从肿瘤诊断到WBRT的间隔时间。结果:WBRT + SRS后1年生存率分别为65%和OP + WBRT + boost后63%(p = 0.19)。 1年脑控制率分别为70%和78%(p = 0.39)。一年本地控制率分别为84%和83%(p = 0.87)。在多变量分析中,改善的生存率与更好的表现状态(p = 0.009),无脑外转移(p = 0.004),1级递归分区分析(p = 0.004)以及从肿瘤诊断到WBRT的间隔(p = 0.001)显着相关。 )。脑内控制与任何潜在的预后因素均无显着相关。改善的局部控制与无脑外转移明显相关(p = 0.037)。结论:WBRT + SRS后的治疗结果与OP + WBRT + boost相比无显着差异。但是,WBRT + SRS的侵袭性小于OP + WBRT + boost,对于具有一或两个脑转移的患者可能更可取。结果应通过随机试验确认。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号