首页> 外文期刊>Spectrochimica Acta, Part B. Atomic Spectroscopy >Determination of trace impurities in boron nitride by graphite ftimace atomic absorption spectrometry and electrothermal vaporization inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry using solid sampling
【24h】

Determination of trace impurities in boron nitride by graphite ftimace atomic absorption spectrometry and electrothermal vaporization inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry using solid sampling

机译:固体样品石墨炉原子吸收光谱和电热蒸发电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定氮化硼中的痕量杂质。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two diuestion-free methods for trace analysis of boron nitride based on graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) and electrothermal vaporization inductively coupled plasma spectrometry optical emission (ETV-ICP-OES) using direct solid sampling have been developed and applied to the determination of Al, Ca, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Si, Ti and Zr in four boron nitride materials in concentration intervals of 1-23, 54-735 0.05-21 0.005-1.3, 1.6-112, 4.5-20, 0.03-1.8, 6-46, 38-170 and 0.4-2.3 lig g(-1), respectively. At optimized experimental conditions, with both methods, effective in-situ analyte/matrix separation was achieved and calibration could be performed using calibration curves measured with aqueous standard solutions. In solid sampling GFAAS, before sampling, the platform was covered with graphite powder and, for determination of Si, also the Pd[Mg(NO3)2 modifier was used. In the determination of all analyte elements by solid sampling ETV-ICPOES. Freon R12 was added to argon carrier -as. For solid sampling GFAAS and ETV-ICP-OES, the achievable limits of detection were within 5 (Cu)-130 (Si) ng g(-1) and 8 (Cu)-200 (Si) ng respectively. The results obtained by these two methods for four boron nitride materials of different purity grades are compared each with the other and with those obtained in analysis of digests by ICP-OES. The performance of the two solid sampling methods is compared and discussed. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:开发了两种基于石墨炉原子吸收光谱法(GFAAS)和电热汽化电感耦合等离子体光谱法(ETV-ICP-OES)的直接固体进样的氮化硼痕量分析的无消解方法,并将其应用到痕量硼的测定中。四种氮化硼材料中Al,Ca,Cr,Cu,Fe,Mg,Mn,Si,Ti和Zr的浓度间隔为1-23、54-735 0.05-21 0.005-1.3、1.6-112、4.5-20, lig g(-1)分别为0.03-1.8、6-46、38-170和0.4-2.3。在优化的实验条件下,使用这两种方法,都可以实现有效的原位分析物/基质分离,并且可以使用标准水溶液测定的校准曲线进行校准。在固体样品GFAAS中,在采样前,平台被石墨粉末覆盖,并且为了确定Si,还使用了Pd [Mg(NO3)2改性剂。通过固体采样ETV-ICPOES测定所有分析物元素。将氟利昂R12添加至氩载体-as。对于固体样品GFAAS和ETV-ICP-OES,可达到的检出限分别在5(Cu)-130(Si)ng g(-1)和8(Cu)-200(Si)ng之内。将这两种方法对四种不同纯度等级的氮化硼材料获得的结果彼此进行比较,并与通过ICP-OES分析消解液获得的结果进行比较。比较和讨论了两种固体采样方法的性能。 (C)2007 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号