...
首页> 外文期刊>Soft computing: A fusion of foundations, methodologies and applications >A new preference scale mcdm method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and the analytic hierarchy process
【24h】

A new preference scale mcdm method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and the analytic hierarchy process

机译:基于区间直觉模糊集和层次分析法的偏好量表Mcdm方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IF-AHP), in which intuitionistic fuzzy numbers are utilized in defining decision makers' linguistic judgment, has been used to solve various multi-criteria decision-making problems. Previous theories have suggested that interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IVIFN) with hesitation degree can act as alternative fuzzy numbers that can handle vagueness and uncertainty. This paper proposes a new preference scale in the framework of the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IVIF-AHP). The comparison matrix judgment is expressed in IVIFN with degree of hesitation. The proposed new preference scale concurrently considers the membership function, the non-membership function and the degree of hesitation of IVIFN. To define the weight entropy of the aggregated matrix of IVIFN, a modified interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy weighted averaging is proposed, by considering the interval number of the hesitation degree. Three multi-criteria decision-making problems are used to test the proposed method. A comparison of the results is also presented to check the feasibility of the proposed method. It is shown that the ranking order of the proposed method is slightly different from that of the other two methods because of the inclusion of the hesitation degree in defining the preference scale.
机译:直觉模糊层次分析法(IF-AHP)用于解决各种多准则决策问题,其中直觉模糊数用于定义决策者的语言判断。先前的理论表明,犹豫程度的区间值直觉模糊数(IVIFN)可以作为替代模糊数,可以处理模糊性和不确定性。本文在区间值直觉模糊层次分析法框架下提出了一种新的偏好量表。比较矩阵判断以犹豫程度在IVIFN中表达。拟议的新偏好量表同时考虑了成员函数,非成员函数和IVIFN的犹豫程度。为了定义IVIFN聚集矩阵的权重熵,提出了一种改进的区间值直觉模糊加权平均算法,该算法考虑了犹豫度的区间数。使用三个多准则决策问题来测试该方法。还对结果进行了比较,以检验所提出方法的可行性。结果表明,该方法的排序顺序与其他两种方法的排序顺序略有不同,这是因为在定义偏好量表时包含了犹豫程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号