...
首页> 外文期刊>Stem cell reviews and Reports >Cross-border research on human embryonic stem cells: legal and ethical considerations.
【24h】

Cross-border research on human embryonic stem cells: legal and ethical considerations.

机译:人类胚胎干细胞的跨界研究:法律和道德考量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although stem cell research is a field that stands to benefit a lot from international cooperation, collaboration between scientists of different countries is hampered by the great divergence in national stem cell legislations. More specifically, researchers from countries with restrictive stem cell policies find themselves unable to participate in international research or attend meetings or workshops in more permissive environments as they fear being prosecuted in their home country for activities that are deemed acceptable abroad. Juridical clarity on this subject is long overdue. Legally, extraterritorial jurisdiction based on the nationality principle does not conflict with international law. However, invoking this principle to prosecute stem cell researchers would constitute a breach with the current custom to limit extraterritorial jurisdiction to exceptional crimes or circumstances. On the ethical front, legislators have an obligation towards their constituents to protect them from harm through the criminal justice system, but at the same time they should be wary of legal moralism and of jeopardising freedom of research. Researchers on their part cannot simply ignore the law whenever it deviates from their personal moral opinions, but they are not acting unethically if they perform research that they esteem to be ethically justified where it is also legally accepted. Allowing researchers to work freely abroad-within the jurisdiction of the host country-is a way for legislator and researcher to show respect for each other's different moral values and to balance their rights and obligations towards each other.
机译:尽管干细胞研究领域将从国际合作中受益匪浅,但各国干细胞法规的巨大差异阻碍了各国科学家之间的合作。更具体地说,来自限制性干细胞政策国家的研究人员发现自己无法参加更宽松的环境中的国际研究或参加会议或讲习班,因为他们担心因在国外被认为可以接受的活动而在其本国受到起诉。关于这一问题的司法解释早就应该提出。从法律上讲,基于国籍原则的域外管辖权与国际法不冲突。但是,援引这一原则起诉干细胞研究人员将违反现行习惯,将域外管辖权限制在特殊罪行或特殊情况下。在道德方面,立法者对选民负有保护其通过刑事司法系统免受伤害的义务,但与此同时,他们应提防法律道德主义和危害研究自由。研究人员本身不能在任何背离个人道德观念的情况下简单地忽视法律,但是,如果他们进行的研究被认为在法律上也被接受,则认为他们在道德上是正当的,这并不是在不道德的行为。允许研究人员在东道国的管辖范围内自由地在国外工作是立法者和研究人员表示尊重彼此不同道德价值观并平衡彼此之间权利和义务的一种方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号