首页> 外文期刊>Sports medicine >Warm Up II : Performance Changes Following Active Warm Up and How to Structure the Warm Up.
【24h】

Warm Up II : Performance Changes Following Active Warm Up and How to Structure the Warm Up.

机译:热身II:主动热身以及如何组织热身后的性能变化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While warm up is considered to be essential for optimum performance, there is little scientific evidence supporting its effectiveness in many situations. As a result, warm-up procedures are usually based on the trial and error experience of the athlete or coach, rather than on scientific study. Summarising the findings of the many warm-up studies conducted over the years is difficult. Many of the earlier studies were poorly controlled, contained few study participants and often omitted statistical analyses. Furthermore, over the years, warm up protocols consisting of different types (e.g. active, passive, specific) and structures (e.g. varied intensity, duration and recovery) have been used. Finally, while many studies have investigated the physiological responses to warm up, relatively few studies have reported changes in performance following warm up. The first part of this review critically analyses reported changes in performance following various active warm-up protocols.While there is a scarcity of well-controlled studies with large subject numbers and appropriate statistical analyses, a number of conclusions can be drawn regarding the effects of active warm up on performance. Active warm up tends to result in slightly larger improvements in short-term performance (<10 seconds) than those achieved by passive heating alone. However, short-term performance may be impaired if the warm-up protocol is too intense or does not allow sufficient recovery, and results in a decreased availability of high-energy phosphates before commencing the task. Active warm up appears to improve both long-term (>/=5 minutes) and intermediate performance (>10 seconds, but <5 minutes) if it allows the athlete to begin the subsequent task in a relatively non-fatigued state, but with an elevated baseline oxygen consumption (V-dotO(2)). While active warm up has been reported to improve endurance performance, it may have a detrimental effect on endurance performance if it causes a significant increase in thermoregulatory strain. The addition of a brief, task-specific burst of activity has been reported to provide further ergogenic benefits for some tasks. By manipulating intensity, duration and recovery, many different warm-up protocols may be able to achieve similar physiological and performance changes. Finally, passive warm-up techniques may be important to supplement or maintain temperature increases produced by an active warm up, especially if there is an unavoidable delay between the warm up and the task and/or the weather is cold. Further research is required to investigate the role of warm up in different environmental conditions, especially for endurance events where a critical core temperature may limit performance.
机译:虽然预热对于获得最佳性能至关重要,但很少有科学证据支持其在许多情况下的有效性。结果,热身程序通常基于运动员或教练的反复试验经验,而不是科学研究。总结多年来进行的许多热身研究的结果很困难。许多较早的研究控制不力,几乎没有研究参与者,并且经常省略统计分析。此外,多年来,已经使用了由不同类型(例如,主动,被动,特定)和结构(例如,不同的强度,持续时间和恢复)组成的预热协议。最后,尽管许多研究调查了预热的生理反应,但很少有研究报道预热后性能的变化。这篇综述的第一部分主要分析了各种主动热身方案后所报告的性能变化。尽管缺乏大量受试者的良好对照研究并进行了适当的统计分析,但可以得出一些有关治疗效果的结论。积极地热身表现。与仅通过被动加热相比,主动预热往往会导致短期性能(<10秒)的改善略大。但是,如果预热协议太激烈或不允许充分恢复,则短期性能可能会受到损害,并导致开始执行该任务之前降低了高能磷酸盐的可用性。如果主动热身可以让运动员在相对疲劳的状态下开始后续任务,但可以改善长期(> / = 5分钟)和中间成绩(> 10秒,但<5分钟)。基线耗氧量升高(V-dotO(2))。虽然据报道主动预热可以改善耐力性能,但如果它引起体温调节力的显着增加,则可能对耐力性能产生不利影响。据报道,增加了一个简短的,针对特定任务的活动,可以为某些任务提供更多的人体工程学益处。通过操纵强度,持续时间和恢复,许多不同的热身方案可能能够实现相似的生理和性能变化。最后,被动预热技术对于补充或维持主动预热产生的温度升高可能很重要,尤其是在预热和任务之间不可避免的延迟和/或天气寒冷的情况下。需要进行进一步的研究来研究在不同环境条件下的暖机作用,特别是对于极限核心温度可能会限制性能的耐力事件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号