...
首页> 外文期刊>Modern rheumatology >Long-term efficacy of leflunomide on disease activity and inhibition of joint damage: retrospective comparison with methotrexate for Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients.
【24h】

Long-term efficacy of leflunomide on disease activity and inhibition of joint damage: retrospective comparison with methotrexate for Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients.

机译:来氟米特对疾病活动性和关节损伤抑制的长期疗效:与甲氨蝶呤在日本类风湿性关节炎患者中的回顾性比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We retrospectively compared treatment impact with leflunomide (LEF) or methotrexate (MTX) on retarding joint damage and clinical symptom including a 28-joint-count Disease Activity Score/erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) between two similar groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over an approximately 3-year treatment. One group included 29 patients treated with LEF alone (average dose 16.1 mg/day); the other group included 26 patients treated with MTX (average dose 7.4 mg/week) alone or combined with other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. At baseline, mean disease duration was 7.1 and 6.9 years, and mean DAS28-ESR was 5.79 and 5.69, respectively. The average DAS28-ESR improvement of 1.750 (from 5.79 to 4.04) in the LEF-treated group was significantly greater than the effect of 1.007 (from 5.69 to 4.68) seen in the MTX group (P = 0.0455), with the same results being observed on European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. Annual changes observed in Larsen score in total joints were 0.030 in the LEF group and 0.085 in the MTX group: LEF retards joint damage significantly better than MTX (P = 0.003). This inhibitory effect was better in small joints (P = 0.004) than in middle and large joints (P = 0.075). A negative correlation was noticed between improved DAS28-ESR and the progression of joint damage in the LEF group (r = -0.7068, P < 0.0001), whereas there was no correlation in the MTX group (r = -0.0311, P = 0.882). In daily clinical practice, LEF showed significant clinical and radiological improvement compared with the standard MTX regimen in Japan.
机译:我们回顾性比较了来氟米特(LEF)或甲氨蝶呤(MTX)对类风湿关节炎患者相似的两组在延缓关节损伤和临床症状(包括28关节计数疾病活动评分/红细胞沉降率(DAS28-ESR))方面的治疗效果(RA)经过大约3年的治疗。一组包括29名接受LEF治疗的患者(平均剂量为16.1 mg /天);另一组包括26例单独或与其他改变疾病的抗风湿药合用MTX(平均剂量7.4 mg /周)治疗的患者。基线时,平均疾病持续时间为7.1年和6.9年,平均DAS28-ESR分别为5.79和5.69。 LEF治疗组的DAS28-ESR平均改善1.750(从5.79到4.04)明显大于MTX组的1.007(从5.69到4.68)(P = 0.0455)。遵守欧洲风湿病联盟(EULAR)响应标准。在LEF组中,总关节的Larsen评分的年度变化为0.030,在MTX组中为0.085:LEF延迟关节损伤的能力明显优于MTX(P = 0.003)。这种抑制作用在小关节(P = 0.004)比中大关节(P = 0.075)更好。在LEF组中,改善的DAS28-ESR与关节损伤的进展之间存在负相关(r = -0.7068,P <0.0001),而在MTX组中则无相关性(r = -0.0311,P = 0.882)。 。在日常临床实践中,与日本的标准MTX方案相比,LEF表现出显着的临床和放射学改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号