首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Looking back on back pain: trial and error of diagnoses in the 20th century.
【24h】

Looking back on back pain: trial and error of diagnoses in the 20th century.

机译:回顾背部疼痛:20世纪诊断的反复试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: The societal costs of low back pain and associated disability are immense. However, very little is known about the etiology of low back pain. Lumbar disc disease was discovered in the last century and became the predominant etiology for back pain. Today we know that for the majority of low back pain cases, a specific etiology cannot be determined. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the evolution of the "disc paradigm" and to compare our contemporary understanding to the scientific discussion in the beginning of the last century. DESIGN: Survey of the highest ranked German medical journal from 1900 to 1999. DATA EXTRACTION: The indexes of 5185 journal issues of the Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift were reviewed for articles about low back pain. DATA SYNTHESIS: For each article, the etiologies were identified, categorized, and counted per decade. In addition, each important etiology was described. CONCLUSIONS: In the beginning of the last century, many heterogeneous etiologies coexisted. In the second half of the century, the theory of disc degeneration took over almost the entire literature about low back pain. Pre-existing theories disappeared, but re-entered the discussion in the last decade. Two factors seemed to influence this development: 1) a tendency to prefer organic, visible abnormalities as etiologies; and 2) an inclination to trust technical diagnostic results more than clinical judgment.
机译:背景:下背部疼痛和相关残疾的社会成本巨大。但是,关于下腰痛的病因知之甚少。腰椎间盘疾病在上个世纪被发现,并成为背痛的主要病因。今天,我们知道,对于大多数下腰痛病例,尚无法确定具体的病因。目的:分析“光盘范例”的演变,并将我们对当代的理解与上世纪初的科学讨论进行比较。设计:对1900年至1999年德国排名最高的医学杂志进行的调查。数据提取:Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift的5185种期刊索引对有关腰痛的文章进行了审查。数据综合:每一篇文章,每十年对病因进行识别,分类和计数。此外,还描述了每种重要的病因。结论:在上个世纪初,许多不同的病因并存。在本世纪下半叶,椎间盘退变的理论几乎接管了所有有关下腰痛的文献。先前存在的理论消失了,但在过去十年中重新进入了讨论。似乎有两个因素影响了这一发展:1)倾向于将有机的,可见的异常作为病因的倾向; 2)倾向于相信技术诊断结果而不是临床判断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号