...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Comparative biomechanical analysis of a cervical cage made of an unsintered hydroxyapatite particle and poly-L-lactide composite in a cadaver model.
【24h】

Comparative biomechanical analysis of a cervical cage made of an unsintered hydroxyapatite particle and poly-L-lactide composite in a cadaver model.

机译:在尸体模型中比较由未烧结的羟基磷灰石颗粒和聚L-丙交酯复合材料制成的子宫颈笼的生物力学分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: A new cage made from a forged composite of unsintered hydroxyapatite particles and poly-L-lactide (F-u-HA/PLLA) is compared biomechanically with the Ray threaded fusion cage. OBJECTIVES: To compare the stability imparted to the human cadaveric spine by two different threaded cervical cages and the effect of cyclic loading on construct stability. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Threaded cages have been developed for use in anterior cervical interbody fusions to provide initial stability during the fusion process. However, metallic instrumentation has several limitations. Recently, totally bioresorbable bone fixation devices made of F-u-HA/PLLA have been developed, including a cage for spinal interbody fusion. However, no biomechanical study has compared the F-u-HA/poly-L-lactide (PLLA) cage with metallic cages. METHODS: For this study, 12 fresh ligamentous human cervical spines (C4-C7) were used. After anterior discectomy across C5-C6, stabilization was achieved with the F-u-HA/PLLA cage in six spines and with the Ray threaded fusion cage in the remaining six spines. Biomechanical testing of the spines was performed with six degrees of freedom before and after stabilization, and after cyclic loading of the stabilized spines (5000 cycles of flexion-extension at 0.5 Nm). RESULTS: The specimens stabilized with either the F-u-HA/PLLA cage or the Ray cage were significantly more stable than the discectomy case in all directions except in extension. In extension, both groups were stiffer, although not at a significant level (P > 0.05). After fatigue, the stiffness, as compared with that in the prefatigue case, decreased in both groups, although not at a significant level. The Ray cage group exhibited better stability than the F-u-HA/PLLA cage group in all directions, although a significant difference was found only in right axial rotation. CONCLUSIONS: The F-u-HA/PLLA cage has the possibility to supplant the use of metallic devices in interbody fusions of the cervical spine.
机译:研究设计:将一种由未烧结的羟基磷灰石颗粒和聚L-丙交酯(F-u-HA / PLLA)的锻造复合材料制成的新型笼子与Ray螺纹融合笼子进行生物力学比较。目的:比较两个不同螺纹的子宫颈笼对人尸体脊柱的稳定性以及循环载荷对结构稳定性的影响。背景技术概述:已经开发了螺纹笼,用于前颈椎椎间融合术,以在融合过程中提供初始稳定性。但是,金属仪器有几个局限性。近来,已经开发了由F-u-HA / PLLA制成的完全可生物吸收的骨固定装置,包括用于椎体间融合的笼子。但是,尚无生物力学研究将F-u-HA /聚L-丙交酯(PLLA)笼与金属笼进行比较。方法:本研究使用了12条新鲜的韧带韧带人颈椎棘突(C4-C7)。在跨过C5-C6的椎间盘切除术后,在6个棘突中使用F-u-HA / PLLA笼子,在其余6个棘突中使用Ray螺纹融合器笼实现稳定。在稳定之前和之后以及稳定的脊柱的周期性载荷(0.5 Nm的5000个屈伸周期)之后,以六个自由度执行脊柱的生物力学测试。结果:用F-u-HA / PLLA笼或Ray笼稳定的标本在所有方向上都比椎间盘切除术病例稳定得多,除了延伸范围外。在延伸方面,两组都比较僵硬,尽管水平不高(P> 0.05)。疲劳后,两组的刚度均与疲劳前相比有所下降,尽管没有显着水平。在所有方向上,Ray笼组都比F-u-HA / PLLA笼组表现出更好的稳定性,尽管仅在右轴向旋转中发现了显着差异。结论:F-u-HA / PLLA笼可以取代金属设备在颈椎椎间融合中的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号