...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain: an updated cochrane review.
【24h】

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain: an updated cochrane review.

机译:非甾体类抗炎药可治疗腰痛:最新的Cochrane评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and COX-2 inhibitors in the treatment of nonspecific low back pain and to assess which type of NSAID is most effective. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: NSAIDs are the most frequently prescribed medications worldwide and are widely used for patients with low back pain. Selective COX-2 inhibitors are currently available and used for patients with low back pain. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to and including June 2007 if reported in English, Dutch, or German. We also screened references given in relevant reviews and identified trials. Randomized trials and double-blind controlled trials of NSAIDs in nonspecific low back pain with or without sciatica were included. RESULTS: In total, 65 trials (total number of patients = 11,237) were included in this review. Twenty-eight trials (42%) were considered high quality. Statistically significant effects were found in favor of NSAIDs compared with placebo, but at the cost of statistically significant more side effects. There is moderate evidence that NSAIDs are not more effective than paracetamol for acute low back pain, but paracetamol had fewer side effects. There is moderate evidence that NSAIDs are not more effective than other drugs for acute low back pain. There is strong evidence that various types of NSAIDs, including COX-2 NSAIDs, are equally effective for acute low back pain. COX-2 NSAIDs had statistically significantly fewer side effects than traditional NSAIDs. CONCLUSION: The evidence from the 65 trials included in this review suggests that NSAIDs are effective for short-term symptomatic relief in patients with acute and chronic low back pain without sciatica. However, effect sizes are small. Furthermore, there does not seem to be a specific type of NSAID, which is clearly more effective than others. The selective COX-2 inhibitors showed fewer side effects compared with traditional NSAIDs in the randomized controlled trials included in this review. However, recent studies have shown that COX-2 inhibitors are associated with increased cardiovascular risks in specific patient populations.
机译:研究设计:随机对照试验的系统评价。目的:评估非甾体类抗炎药(NSAID)和COX-2抑制剂在治疗非特异性下背痛中的作用,并评估哪种类型的NSAID最有效。背景数据概述:非甾体抗炎药是全世界最常用的处方药,广泛用于腰痛患者。选择性COX-2抑制剂目前可用于腰痛患者。方法:如果以英语,荷兰语或德语报道,我们搜索了截至2007年6月(含)的MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库以及对照试验的Cochrane中央登记册。我们还筛选了相关评论中给出的参考文献并确定了试验。 NSAIDs在有或没有坐骨神经痛的非特异性下腰痛中的随机试验和双盲对照试验均包括在内。结果:本评价总共包括65个试验(患者总数= 11,237)。 28个试验(42%)被认为是高质量的。发现与安慰剂相比,NSAIDs具有统计学意义的显着疗效,但以统计学上显着的更多副作用为代价。有中等程度的证据表明,NSAIDs在急性下腰痛方面没有比对乙酰氨基酚有效,但对乙酰氨基酚的副作用较小。有中等证据表明,非甾体抗炎药对急性下腰痛的疗效不比其他药物有效。有充分的证据表明,各种类型的NSAID,包括COX-2 NSAID,对于急性下背痛同样有效。与传统的NSAID相比,COX-2 NSAID的副作用在统计学上显着减少。结论:本评价中包括的65个试验的证据表明,NSAIDs可有效治疗无坐骨神经痛的急慢性腰背痛患者的短期症状。但是,效果尺寸很小。此外,似乎没有特定类型的NSAID,这显然比其他药物更有效。与传统的NSAID相比,选择性COX-2抑制剂在本评价中包括的随机对照试验中显示出较少的副作用。但是,最近的研究表明,COX-2抑制剂与特定患者群体的心血管风险增加有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号