首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Variation in care among spinal deformity surgeons: results of a survey of the Shriners hospitals for children.
【24h】

Variation in care among spinal deformity surgeons: results of a survey of the Shriners hospitals for children.

机译:脊柱畸形外科医生的护理差异:Shriners儿童医院的一项调查结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Survey. OBJECTIVE: To understand the variation in scoliosis surgery and perioperative care among spinal deformity surgeons. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: While variation in care has been well described in many spinal disorders, the degree of variation has not been described for spinal deformity. METHODS: Clinical histories and radiographs of 4 typical spinal deformity patients were sent to spinal deformity surgeons for review. The cases consisted of idiopathic thoracolumbar, double major, and right thoracic curves and a neuromuscular lumbar curve. The survey queried choice of surgical approach, levels fused and instrumented, type of instrumentation, preoperative testing, intraoperative neurologic monitoring, blood and antibiotic use, and postoperative care, including pain control and patient mobilization. Cost estimates for each case were obtained from the individual hospitals' pricing. RESULTS: There was wide variation in the specific fusion levels and instrumentation for the idiopathic curves. The variation was greatest for the thoracolumbar curve. The double major and right thoracic curves differed primarily in their choice of instrumenting secondary curves. The neuromuscular curve had the least variation. Costs estimates were widely disparate between centers. Perioperative care had much less disparity. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement appears common in areas with readily identifiable outcomes such as shorter length of stay and rapid postoperative mobilization. However, agreement is poor in areas where outcomes are difficult to measure and require long-term follow-up such as instrumentation fusion and levels.
机译:研究设计:调查。目的:了解脊柱畸形外科医生在脊柱侧弯手术和围手术期护理中的差异。背景资料概述:虽然在许多脊柱疾病中已经很好地描述了护理的变化,但尚未描述脊柱畸形的变化程度。方法:将4例典型脊柱畸形患者的临床病史和X线照片发送至脊柱畸形外科医师进行复查。病例包括特发性胸腰椎,双大,右胸曲线和神经肌肉腰曲线。这项调查询问了手术方法,融合和器械水平,器械类型,术前测试,术中神经学监测,血液和抗生素使用以及术后护理(包括疼痛控制和患者动员)的选择。每个案例的成本估算是从各个医院的定价中获得的。结果:特发性曲线的具体融合水平和仪器存在很大差异。胸腰曲线变化最大。双主干和右胸曲线主要在选择辅助曲线方面有所不同。神经肌肉曲线变化最小。各个中心之间的成本估算差异很大。围手术期的差异少得多。结论:在容易确定结果的区域,例如住院时间短和术后快速动员,协议似乎很普遍。但是,在结果难以测量且需要长期随访(如仪器融合和水平)的领域,一致性差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号