首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Randomized trial comparing interferential therapy with motorized lumbar traction and massage in the management of low back pain in a primary care setting.
【24h】

Randomized trial comparing interferential therapy with motorized lumbar traction and massage in the management of low back pain in a primary care setting.

机译:在初级保健机构中,比较干预疗法与电动腰椎牵引和按摩治疗腰痛的随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: A randomized trial designed to compare interferential therapy with motorized lumbar traction and massage management for low back pain in a primary care setting. OBJECTIVE: To measure and compare the outcome of interferential therapy and management by motorized lumbar traction and massage. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Management of low back pain by interferential therapy and motorized lumbar traction and massage is common in Germany. No reports of previous randomized trials for the outcome from interferential therapy were found. METHODS: Consenting patients were randomly assigned into one of two groups. A pretreatment interview was performed by the patient using a computer-based questionnaire. It also incorporated the Oswestry Disability Index and a pain visual analog scale. Management consisted of six sessions over a 2- to 3-week period. Oswestry Disability Indexes and pain visual analog scale scores also were obtained immediately after and at 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients were recruited. The two treatment groups had similar demographic and clinical baseline characteristics. The mean Oswestry Disability Index before treatment was 30 for both groups (n = 147). After treatment, this had dropped to 25, and, at 3 months, were 21 (interferential therapy) and 22 (motorized lumbar traction and massage). The mean pain visual analog scale score before treatment was 50 (interferential therapy) and 51 (motorized lumbar traction and massage). This had dropped, respectively, to 46 and 44 after treatment and to 42 and 39 at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a progressive fall in Oswestry Disability Index and pain visual analog scale scores in patients with low back pain treated with either-interferential therapy or motorized lumbar traction and massage. There was no difference in the improvement between the two groups at the end of treatment. Although there is evidence from several trials that traction alone is ineffective in the management of low back pain, this study could not exclude some effect from the concomitant massage.
机译:研究设计:一项随机试验,旨在比较在初级保健机构中,腰椎间盘突出症和电动腰椎牵引和按摩治疗对腰痛的干预作用。目的:测量和比较通过电动腰椎牵引和按摩进行干扰治疗和治疗的结果。背景数据摘要:在德国,通常通过干扰疗法以及电动腰椎牵引和按摩来治疗腰痛。以前没有关于干扰治疗结果的随机试验的报道。方法:将同意患者随机分为两组。患者使用基于计算机的问卷进行了治疗前访谈。它还纳入了Oswestry残疾指数和疼痛视觉模拟量表。管理过程为期2至3周,共进行六次会议。在治疗后和治疗后3个月也获得了Oswestry残疾指数和疼痛视觉模拟量表评分。结果:共招募152例患者。两个治疗组具有相似的人口统计学和临床​​基线特征。两组治疗前平均Oswestry残疾指数均为30(n = 147)。治疗后,该值下降到25,在3个月时分别为21(干扰疗法)和22(机动腰椎牵引和按摩)。治疗前平均疼痛视觉模拟量表评分为50(干预疗法)和51(机动腰椎牵引和按摩)。治疗后分别下降至46和44,3个月时下降至42和39。结论:这项研究表明,通过干预疗法或电动腰椎牵引和按摩治疗的腰痛患者的Oswestry残疾指数和疼痛视觉模拟量表评分均逐渐下降。治疗结束后两组之间的改善没有差异。尽管有数项试验表明仅靠牵引对治疗下背痛无效,但这项研究不能排除伴随按摩带来的某些影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号