首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Relatively Large Cervical Spinal Cord for Spinal Canal is a Risk factor for Development of Cervical Spinal Cord Compression: A Cross-Sectional Study of 1211 Subjects
【24h】

Relatively Large Cervical Spinal Cord for Spinal Canal is a Risk factor for Development of Cervical Spinal Cord Compression: A Cross-Sectional Study of 1211 Subjects

机译:颈椎相对较大的颈椎脊髓是发展颈椎脊髓压迫症的危险因素:一项针对1211名受试者的横断面研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Design.A cross-sectional study.Objective.This study aims to investigate the correlation of the cervical canal and spinal cord size, and evaluate whether the size of the spinal cord relative to the spinal canal is a risk factor for development of cervical spinal cord compression (SCC).Summary of Background Data.There is little knowledge regarding the relationship between cervical bony canal and spinal cord diameters. Although developmental canal stenosis has been recognized as a risk factor for SCC, the size of the spinal cord relative to the spinal canal has not been similarly discussed.Methods.Cervical canal anteroposterior (AP) diameters on X-rays and AP diameters and cross-sectional areas of dural sacs and spinal cords on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were measured in 1211 healthy volunteers. Correlation between cervical canal diameter on X-rays and AP diameter and cross-sectional area of dural sacs and spinal cords on MRI were assessed. The ratio of the AP diameter of the spinal cord/dural sac was compared between subjects with and without SCC.Results.Spinal canal diameters were not highly correlated with spinal cord AP diameters and cross-sectional areas, although spinal canal diameters were significantly correlated with dural sac AP diameters. The individual difference in the ratio of the AP diameter of the spinal cord/dural sac was large (35%-93%), and the ratio was significantly larger in the subjects with SCC. An AP diameter ratio more than 62% at the C2 to C3 disc level is a risk factor for developing SCC.Conclusion.The spinal cord diameter was independent of the spinal canal diameter and the relative size of a spinal cord and spinal canal differed on an individual basis. In addition, the ratio of spinal cord/dural sac in subjects with SCC was significantly larger. Therefore, a relatively large spinal cord could be a risk factor for SCC.Level of Evidence: 3
机译:研究设计:一项横断面研究。目的:该研究旨在研究宫颈管与脊髓大小的相关性,并评估相对于椎管的脊髓大小是否是发展颈椎的危险因素。脊髓压迫(SCC)。背景数据摘要。关于颈椎骨管与脊髓直径之间关系的知识很少。尽管发育管狭窄已被认为是SCC的危险因素,但脊髓相对于椎管的大小尚未得到类似的讨论。在1211名健康志愿者中测量了磁共振成像(MRI)上的硬膜囊和脊髓的截面积。 X射线检查颈管直径与AP直径以及MRI硬膜囊和脊髓截面积的相关性。比较有无SCC的受试者的脊髓/硬膜囊的AP直径之比。结果:尽管椎管直径与脊髓直径显着相关,但椎管直径与脊髓AP直径和横截面积没有高度相关硬膜囊AP直径。脊髓/硬膜囊的AP直径之比的个体差异较大(35%-93%),并且在患有SCC的受试者中,该比率明显更大。在C2到C3椎间盘水平上,AP直径比超过62%是发展为SCC的危险因素。结论:脊髓直径与椎管直径无关,并且脊髓和椎管的相对大小在个人基础。另外,患有SCC的受试者中脊髓/硬膜囊的比例明显更大。因此,相对较大的脊髓可能是SCC的危险因素。证据级别:3

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号