首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Soft Tissue and Bone Defect Management in Total Sacrectomy for Primary Sacral Tumors: A Systematic Review With Expert Recommendations
【24h】

Soft Tissue and Bone Defect Management in Total Sacrectomy for Primary Sacral Tumors: A Systematic Review With Expert Recommendations

机译:全组织ectomy骨切除术治疗Primary骨原发肿瘤的软组织和骨缺损管理:专家推荐的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Design.Systematic review and expert consensus.Objective.To address the following two questions: (A) Is there a difference in outcomes after spino-pelvic reconstruction of total sacrectomy defects compared with no reconstruction? (B) What constitutes best surgical technique for soft tissue and bony reconstruction after total sacrectomy?Summary of Background Data.The management of the soft tissue and bony defect after total sacrectomy for primary sacral tumors remains a challenge due to the complex anatomical relationships and biomechanical requirements. The scarcity of evidence-based literature in this specialized field makes it difficult for the treating surgeon to make an informed choice.Methods.A systematic literature review was performed (1950-2015), followed by a meeting of an international expert panel. Medline, Embase, and CINAHL databases and Cochrane Libraries were searched. Using the GRADE guidelines, the panel of experts formulated recommendations based on the available evidence.Results.Three hundred fifty-three studies were identified. Of these, 17 studies were included and were case series. Seven were evaluated as high quality of evidence and nine were of low quality. There were a total of 116 participants. Three studies included patients (n=24) with no spino-pelvic reconstruction. One study included patients (n=3) with vascularized bone reconstruction. Twelve studies included patients (n=80) with no soft tissue reconstruction, three studies described patients with a local flap (n=20), and four studies with patients having regional flap reconstruction (n=16). Patients with or without spino-pelvic reconstruction had similar outcomes with regards to walking; however, most patients in the nonreconstructed group had some ilio-lumbar ligamentous stability preserved. The wound dehiscence and return to theater rates were higher in patients with no soft tissue reconstruction.Conclusion.We recommend spino-pelvic reconstruction be undertaken with soft tissue reconstruction after total sacrectomy.Level of Evidence: N/A
机译:研究设计。系统评价和专家共识。目的。要解决以下两个问题:(A)脊髓盂重建全of骨缺损后的预后与未重建相比有差异吗? (B)什么是构成全ectomy骨切除后软组织和骨重建的最佳外科手术技术?背景数据摘要由于复杂的解剖学关系和生物力学,全sa骨切除后软组织和骨缺损的治疗仍然是一个挑战。要求。该专业领域缺乏循证文献,这使得治疗外科医生难以做出明智的选择。方法。进行了系统的文献综述(1950-2015),随后举行了一次国际专家小组会议。搜索Medline,Embase和CINAHL数据库以及Cochrane库。根据GRADE指南,专家小组根据现有证据制定了建议。结果。确定了353项研究。其中,纳入了17项研究,均为病例系列。有7个被评估为高质量的证据,另外9个被评估为低质量的证据。共有116位参与者。三项研究包括无脊柱骨盆重建的患者(n = 24)。一项研究包括了血管重建骨的患者(n = 3)。十二项研究包括无软组织重建的患者(n = 80),三项研究描述了局部皮瓣重建患者(n = 20),四项研究与区域皮瓣重建患者(n = 16)。有或没有脊柱骨盆重建的患者在行走方面有相似的结果。但是,未重建组的大多数患者保留了一些i腰韧带稳定性。没有软组织重建的患者伤口裂开和恢复手术率较高。结论。我们建议在全sa骨切除术后使用软组织重建进行脊柱骨盆重建。证据水平:N / A

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号