首页> 外文期刊>Southern Medical Journal >Does physician benchmarking improve performance of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy?
【24h】

Does physician benchmarking improve performance of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy?

机译:医师基准测试能否改善腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术的性能?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Benchmarking techniques were implemented to optimize operating time and charges associated with laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The baseline LAVH profile over a period of 4 years (167 cases) was compared with 1-year data (47 cases) after a benchmarking educational program (disseminating data ranking performance by each surgeon plus suggestions for improvement). Preintervention and postintervention profiles were compared by means of Student t test and wilcoxon rank sum analysis. Hierarchical multiple regression was used to identify additional sources of variation for operative charges and time. RESULTS: Mean operating times after implementing benchmarking were lower, averaging 182 versus 197 minutes in the control subjects (P = 0.05). We found no significant difference in total or operative charges. After adjusting for potential confounders, benchmarking remained associated with decreased operating time in the multivariate model (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: LAVH operating times decreased after a surgical benchmarking and education intervention, but operating charges did not.
机译:背景:实施基准测试技术以优化与腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术(LAVH)相关的手术时间和费用。材料和方法:在基准教育计划(传播每个医生的数据排名表现以及改进建议)之后,将4年内的基线LAVH概况(167例)与1年数据(47例)进行了比较。通过Student t检验和wilcoxon秩和分析比较干预前和干预后的情况。分层多元回归用于确定手术费用和时间的其他变异来源。结果:实施基准测试后的平均手术时间较短,对照组平均为182分钟(相对于197分钟)(P = 0.05)。我们发现总费用或手术费用没有显着差异。在对潜在的混杂因素进行调整之后,基准测试仍与多变量模型中的减少操作时间相关(P = 0.01)。结论:手术基准和教育干预后,LAVH手术时间减少,但手术费用并未减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号