首页> 外文期刊>Spine >A cross-sectional study comparing the Oswestry and Roland-Morris Functional Disability scales in two populations of patients with low back pain of different levels of severity.
【24h】

A cross-sectional study comparing the Oswestry and Roland-Morris Functional Disability scales in two populations of patients with low back pain of different levels of severity.

机译:一项横断面研究比较了两个严重程度不同的下背痛患者的Oswestry和Roland-Morris功能障碍量表。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study compares the Oswestry and Roland-Morris disability scales in two groups of patients with low back pain of different clinical and electromyographic severity. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the correlation between functional disability and diagnoses. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is an increasing need for functional disability measurements to be applied to the evaluation of therapy and outcome in patients experiencing low back pain. METHODS: Two very different groups of patients with low back pain completed the Oswestry and Roland-Morris self-administrated functional disability questionnaires. One group included patients presenting with an episode of mechanical low back pain with no clinical radiculopathy. The other group consisted of patients with low back pain and clinical and electromyographic evidence of radiculopathy. RESULTS: Patients diagnosed with low back pain who exhibited signs of radiculopathy on electromyography had a mean score of 49.1 +/- 17.1 on the Oswestry disability questionnaire; a mean score of 33.0 +/- 14.7 was found for patients who experienced "simple" low back sprain (with no radiculopathy). This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). On the Roland-Morris questionnaire, the mean score obtained by the group of patients with radiculopathy was 59.1 +/- 21.8 compared with 45.4 +/- 19.4 for those with no radiculopathy. This difference was also statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Moreover, there exists a moderate correlation between both functional scales within each group of patients: 0.72 (P < 0.0001) in the group with radiculopathy and 0.66 (P < 0.0001) among those without radiculopathy. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that both functional disability scales accurately discriminated between these two groups of patients with low back pain of very different clinical and electromyographic severity.
机译:研究设计:这项横断面研究比较了两组临床和肌电图严重程度不同的下腰痛患者的Oswestry和Roland-Morris残疾量表。目的:评估功能障碍与诊断之间的相关性。背景数据概述:对于功能性残疾测量,越来越需要用于评估腰背痛患者的治疗和预后。方法:两组非常不同的下腰痛患者完成了Oswestry和Roland-Morris自我管理的功能障碍问卷。一组包括出现机械性下腰痛发作且无临床神经根病的患者。另一组包括腰痛,神经根病的临床和肌电图证据的患者。结果:在肌电图上被诊断为腰痛的患者在神经肌电图上显示出神经根病变的迹象,在Oswestry残疾问卷上的平均得分为49.1 +/- 17.1;对于经历“简单的”腰背扭伤(无神经根病)的患者,平均得分为33.0 +/- 14.7。这种差异具有统计学意义(P <0.0001)。在Roland-Morris问卷中,神经根病患者组的平均得分为59.1 +/- 21.8,而无神经根病患者的平均得分为45.4 +/- 19.4。该差异在统计学上也很显着(P <0.0001)。此外,每组患者的两个功能量表之间存在中等相关性:神经根病患者组为0.72(P <0.0001),而无神经根病患者为0.66(P <0.0001)。结论:作者得出结论,这两种功能障碍量表均能准确区分这两组临床和肌电图严重程度不同的下腰痛患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号