首页> 外文期刊>Spine >In vitro, biomechanical comparison of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anteriorly placed, low-profile lumbar plate and posteriorly placed pedicle screws or translaminar screws.
【24h】

In vitro, biomechanical comparison of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anteriorly placed, low-profile lumbar plate and posteriorly placed pedicle screws or translaminar screws.

机译:在体外生物力学比较前腰椎椎间融合器与前方放置的,低调的腰椎板和后方放置的椎弓根螺钉或椎板螺钉。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro biomechanical comparison of anteriorly placed lumbar plates, pedicle screws, and translaminar screws in the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) setting. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether an anteriorly placed lumbar plate reduces the flexibility in terms of neutral zone and range of motion of a simulated ALIF, and to compare this reduction in flexibility to that provided by posteriorly placed pedicle screws and translaminar screws. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicular and translaminar facet fixation add stability and increase fusion rates, compared with ALIF alone. An anteriorly placed lumbar plate has been introduced to provide stability without the need for a secondary approach. However, this plate has not been evaluated biomechanically. METHODS: Seven intact, cadaveric lumbar motion segments were tested to +/- 7.5 Nm in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion. Specimens were retested after ALIF, and after subsequent instrumentation with pedicle screws, translaminar screws, and anterior lumbar plates. The range of motion and neutral zone were measured from resulting flexibility curves. RESULTS: Mean (+/- standard deviation) flexion-extension range of motion for intact segments (9.9 degrees +/- 3.1 degrees ) was significantly reduced to 7.7 degrees +/- 1.8 degrees after ALIF (P = 0.02), and was further reduced to 3.0 degrees +/- 0.9 degrees with lumbar plates (P < 0.001), 1.5 degrees +/- 0.6 degrees with pedicle screws (P < 0.001), and 0.9 degrees +/- 0.4 degrees with translaminar screws (P < 0.001). All 3 devices also reduced flexion-extension neutral zone and torsion neutral zone and range of motion, compared with ALIF alone (P < 0.05). Lumbar plates did not decrease lateral bending range of motion or neutral zone (P > 0.05), whereas pedicle and translaminar screws did (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although not as rigid as pedicle or translaminar screws, anterior lumbar plating does add significant stability to an ALIF and may provide a valuable, single-approachalternative to supplemental posterior fixation.
机译:研究设计:在前腰椎椎间融合术(ALIF)设置中,前放置腰椎板,椎弓根螺钉和经椎板螺钉的体外生物力学比较。目的:确定前放置的腰椎板是否在模拟ALIF的中性区和运动范围方面降低了柔韧性,并将这种柔韧性的降低与后椎弓根螺钉和椎弓根螺钉的柔韧性降低进行了比较。背景数据汇总:与单独的ALIF相比,椎弓根和椎板小平面固定增加了稳定性并提高了融合速度。已经引入了腰椎前板以提供稳定性,而无需第二种方法。但是,该板尚未进行生物力学评估。方法:测试了七个完整的尸体腰椎运动节段的屈伸,横向弯曲和轴向扭转至+/- 7.5 Nm。在ALIF之后,以及随后用椎弓根螺钉,经椎板螺钉和前腰椎板进行器械检查后,对样本进行重新测试。从产生的柔韧性曲线测量运动范围和中性区。结果:ALIF后,完整节段(9.9度+/- 3.1度)的平均(+/-标准偏差)运动的屈伸范围显着降低至7.7度+/- 1.8度(P = 0.02),并且进一步腰椎板降低至3.0度+/- 0.9度(P <0.001),椎弓根螺钉降低至1.5度+/- 0.6度(P <0.001),而椎弓根螺钉降低至0.9度+/- 0.4度(P <0.001) 。与单独的ALIF相比,所有3种装置还减少了屈伸中性区和扭转中性区以及运动范围(P <0.05)。腰椎板未降低运动或中性区的横向弯曲范围(P> 0.05),而椎弓根和经椎板螺钉则降低了(P <0.05)。结论:尽管前腰椎板不如椎弓根螺钉或椎弓根螺钉坚硬,但确实为ALIF增加了显着的稳定性,并且可以为后路辅助固定提供有价值的,单一的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号