首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Letter to the editor
【24h】

Letter to the editor

机译:给编辑的信

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Wilemink et al1 recently published results from a prospective single-arm trial examining the effects of isolated lumbar extension (ILEX) resistance training (RT) upon lumbar multifidus (MF) cross-sectional area (CSA), and disability using the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire. Investigating the effects of exercise interventions in chronic low back pain to understand mechanisms involved in producing clinical improvements is of considerable value. This is particularly important considering recent suggestions that conditioning effects of exercise interventions (i.e., improved strength, endurance, or hypertrophy) are not associated with change in clinical outcomes.2 However, as Willemink et al1 examined a highly specific exercise, ILEX, their study could potentially provide more specific information. We have previously highlighted the importance of specificity.3 Unfortunately, the methodology of this study creates difficulty in surmising why no change in MF CSA occurred despite improved Roland-Morris disability questionnaire scores. Absence of control group notwithstanding, particular concern pertains to control of RT variables in their intervention.
机译:Wilemink等[1]最近发表了一项前瞻性单臂试验的结果,该试验研究了孤立的腰椎伸展(ILEX)阻力训练(RT)对腰多裂(MF)截面积(CSA)和使用Roland-Morris残疾的残疾的影响问卷。研究运动干预对慢性下腰痛的影响,以了解产生临床改善的机制,具有重要的价值。考虑到最近的建议,即锻炼干预的调节作用(即提高强度,耐力或肥大)与临床结果的变化无关,这一点尤其重要。2然而,由于Willemink等[1]研究了一种高度特异性的锻炼,即ILEX,他们的研究可能会提供更具体的信息。之前,我们强调了特异性的重要性。3不幸的是,这项研究的方法难以推测为什么尽管Roland-Morris残疾问卷的得分有所提高,但MF CSA却没有发生变化。尽管没有对照组,但在干预中控制RT变量尤为重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号