首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Does superior-segment facet violation or laminectomy destabilize the adjacent level in lumbar transpedicular fixation? An in vitro human cadaveric assessment.
【24h】

Does superior-segment facet violation or laminectomy destabilize the adjacent level in lumbar transpedicular fixation? An in vitro human cadaveric assessment.

机译:上节段小平面侵犯或椎板切除术是否会使腰椎椎弓根固定术中的邻近水平不稳定?体外人体尸体评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: This is an in vitro biomechanical study. OBJECTIVE: The current investigation was performed to evaluate adjacent level kinematic change following unilateral and bilateral facet violation and laminectomy following 1-, 2-, and 3-level reconstruction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The incidence of superior-segment facet violation with lumbar transpedicular fixation has been reported as high as 35%; however, its contribution to biomechanical instability at the supradjacent level is unknown. In addition, superior-segment laminectomy has been implicated as a risk factor for the development of adjacent level disease. The authors assess the acute biomechanical effects of proximal facet violation and subsequent laminectomy in an instrumented posterior fusion model in 10 cadaveric specimens. METHODS: Biomechanical testing was performed on 10 human cadaveric spines under axial rotation (AR), flexion-extension (FE), and lateral bending (LB) loading. After intact analysis, pedicle screws were inserted from L5-S1 and testing repeated with: (1) preserved L4-L5 facets, (2) unilateral facet breach, (3) bilateral breach, and (4) L5 laminectomy. Following biomechanical analysis, instrumentation was extended to L4, then L3 and biomechanical testing repeated. Full range of motion (ROM) at the proximal adjacent levels were recorded and normalized to intact (100%). RESULTS: Supradjacent level ROM was increased for all groups under all loading methods relative to intact (P < 0.05). However, AR testing revealed progressive instability at the adjacent level in groups 3 and 4, relative to group 1, following 1-, 2- and 3-level fixation (P < 0.05). During FE, supradjacent level ROM was significantly increased for group 4 specimens compared with group 1 after L5-S1 fixation (P < 0.05), and was greater than all other groups for L3-S1 constructs (P < 0.05). Interestingly, under lateral bending, facet joint destabilization did not change adjacent segment ROM. CONCLUSION: There were significant changes in proximal level ROM immediately after posterior stabilization. However, an additional increase in supradjacent segment ROM was recorded during AR after bilateral facet breach.Subsequent complete laminectomy at the uppermostfixation level further destabilized the supradjacent segment in FE and AR. Therefore, meticulous preservation of the cephalad-most segment facet joints-is paramount to ensure stability.
机译:研究设计:这是一项体外生物力学研究。目的:本研究旨在评估单侧和双侧小平面侵犯以及1、2和3级重建后椎板切除术的相邻水平运动学变化。背景资料摘要:据报道,经腰椎椎弓根固定术侵犯上节小平面的发生率高达35%。然而,其对生物力学不稳定性的贡献尚不清楚。此外,上节椎板切除术已被认为是发展为邻近级别疾病的危险因素。作者评估了在10具尸体标本的后路融合模型中近端小平面侵犯和随后的椎板切除术的急性生物力学作用。方法:在10个人体尸体脊椎在轴向旋转(AR),屈伸(FE)和横向弯曲(LB)载荷下进行了生物力学测试。完整分析后,从L5-S1插入椎弓根螺钉,并重复进行以下测试:(1)保留L4-L5小平面,(2)单侧小平面破裂,(3)双侧破裂,和(4)L5椎板切除术。经过生物力学分析,将仪器扩展到L4,然后再进行L3和生物力学测试。记录近端邻近水平的整个运动范围(ROM),并标准化为完整(100%)。结果:在所有加载方法下,相对于完整组,所有组的超载水平ROM均增加(P <0.05)。但是,AR测试显示,在进行1级,2级和3级固定后,相对于1组,第3组和第4组在相邻水平上逐渐进行性不稳定(P <0.05)。在FE期间,L5-S1固定后与第1组相比,第4组标本的上侧ROM显着增加(P <0.05),并且对于L3-S1构建体,高于所有其他组(P <0.05)。有趣的是,在横向弯曲下,小面关节不稳定不会改变相邻节段ROM。结论:后路稳定后立即改变近端ROM。然而,在双侧小面破裂后的AR期间,记录了上段ROM的额外增加。随后在最高固定水平进行完全椎板切除术进一步使FE和AR上段的不稳定。因此,对头端最细小节小关节的精心保存对于确保稳定性至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号