...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Can prophylactic bilateral C4/C5 foraminotomy prevent postoperative C5 palsy after open-door laminoplasty?: A prospective study
【24h】

Can prophylactic bilateral C4/C5 foraminotomy prevent postoperative C5 palsy after open-door laminoplasty?: A prospective study

机译:预防性双侧C4 / C5椎间孔切开术能否预防开门椎板成形术术后C5麻痹?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Design. A prospective study. Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic C4/C5 microforaminotomy with open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy in preventing postoperative C5 palsy. Summary of Background Data. Postoperative C5 palsy is a common complication of cervical laminoplasty. Although the etiology of C5 palsy and preventive measures remain unclear, we hypothesize that C5 palsy is caused by C5 nerve root impairment induced by potential C4/C5 foraminal stenosis and posterior shifting of the spinal cord after laminoplasty. Methods. The study included 141 consecutive patients with cervical myelopathy (103 men and 38 women) who underwent open-door laminoplasty with prophylactic bilateral C4/C5 foraminotomy between 2009 and 2010. These were designated as the foraminotomy group (FG). One hundred forty-one consecutive patients (100 men and 41 women) who underwent open-door laminoplasty without prophylactic foraminotomy during 2006 to 2008 served as a control group. This was the nonforaminotomy group (NFG). The incidence of C5 palsy, operation time, blood loss, and the number of decompressed disc levels were recorded. Results. The incidence of C5 palsy was 1.4% (2 of 141 cases) in the FG, and 6.4% (9 of 141 cases) in the NFG. The mean operation times were 129 and 102 minutes, respectively. There were significant differences in the incidence of C5 palsy and operation time (both comparisons, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in blood loss or the number of decompressed disc levels (both comparisons, P > 0.05). Conclusion. Prophylactic bilateral C4/C5 microforaminotomy significantly decreased the incidence of postoperative C5 palsy. These results suggest that the main etiology of C5 palsy was C5 root impairment. However, 2 patients experienced C5 palsy despite undergoing prophylactic foraminotomy, which indicated that other factors including spinal cord impairment after acute decompression against cervical canal stenosis may also be considered as minor etiologies of C5 palsy. We conclude that prophylactic C4/C5 foraminotomy was an effective preventive measure against postoperative C5 palsy after laminoplasty.
机译:学习规划。前瞻性研究。目的。为了评估预防性的C4 / C5椎间孔切开术联合开门椎板扩大成形术对颈椎病的预防效果,以预防术后C5麻痹。背景数据摘要。术后C5麻痹是宫颈椎管成形术的常见并发症。尽管C5麻痹的病因和预防措施尚不清楚,但我们推测C5麻痹是由潜在的C4 / C5椎间孔狭窄和椎板成形术后脊髓后移引起的C5神经根损伤引起的。方法。该研究纳入了141例连续2009年至2010年间接受预防性双侧C4 / C5椎间孔切开术的门颈椎病患者(男性103例,女性38例)。这些患者被指定为椎间孔切开术组(FG)。于2006年至2008年间,连续141例患者(100例男性和41例女性)在未进行预防性开孔的情况下接受开门椎板扩大成形术,作为对照组。这是非开孔手术组(NFG)。记录C5麻痹的发生率,手术时间,失血和减压盘水平的数量。结果。在FG中,C5麻痹的发生率为1.4%(141例中的2例),在NFG中为6.4%(141例中的9例)。平均操作时间分别为129分钟和102分钟。 C5麻痹的发生率和手术时间存在显着差异(两者均比较,P <0.05)。失血量或减压椎间盘水平数目均无显着差异(两者均比较,P> 0.05)。结论。预防性双侧C4 / C5椎间孔切开术可显着降低术后C5麻痹的发生率。这些结果表明,C5麻痹的主要病因是C5根损害。然而,尽管有2例患者进行了预防性开孔术,但仍经历了C5麻痹,这表明其他因素包括急性减压对宫颈管狭窄后的脊髓损伤也可能被认为是C5麻痹的次要病因。我们得出的结论是,预防性C4 / C5椎间孔切开术是对椎板成形术术后C5麻痹的有效预防措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号