...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Relative safety of anterior microsurgical decompression versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with a massive ossified posterior longitudinal ligament.
【24h】

Relative safety of anterior microsurgical decompression versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with a massive ossified posterior longitudinal ligament.

机译:颈椎前路大韧度骨化后颈椎病的前路显微减压术与椎板成形术相对安全。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective clinical study was conducted. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relative safety of anterior microsurgical decompression with iliac strut graft fusion versus laminoplasty for a massive ossified posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The question of how the treatment for cervical myelopathy associated with a massive ossified posterior longitudinal ligament can be improved remains unclear. METHODS: Addressing this question involved analyzing the data for 26 patients who had undergone either an anterior (n = 14) or posterior procedure (n = 12) for a large ossified posterior longitudinal ligament with the thickness exceeding 50% of the bony canal diameter (average, 65%; range, 52-81%). RESULTS: The two groups showed no statistical difference in preoperative factors including age, duration of symptoms, functional score, maximal occupancy ratio of the ossified posterior longitudinal ligament to the canal, and magnetic resonance findings such as the longitudinal extent of distinct cord indentations and the degrees of spinal cord flattening. Despite comparable postoperative improvement of the cord flattening between the two groups, the anterior procedure showed a significantly better functional result (P < 0.003) with no neurologic complications. In comparison, laminoplasty was associated with a significant neurologic deterioration immediately after surgery in four patients (33%). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior microsurgical decompression for a massive ossified posterior longitudinal ligament, although technically more demanding, seems counterintuitively safer than laminoplasty. For a better understanding of the underlying mechanism for neurologic worsening after laminoplasty, electrophysiologic monitoring of the spinal cord and the roots function seems essential not only during surgery, but also during presurgical positioning of the patient.
机译:研究设计:进行了回顾性临床研究。目的:探讨micro骨支架移植术与椎板成形术联合前路显微外科减压术治疗颈椎椎体后纵韧带骨化的相对安全性。背景数据概述:如何改善与巨大的骨化后纵韧带相关的颈椎病的治疗方法的问题尚不清楚。方法:解决该问题涉及分析26例行大骨化后纵韧带,厚度超过骨管直径(50%)的前路(n = 14)或后路手术(n = 12)的患者的数据(平均65%;范围52-81%)。结果:两组的术前因素无统计学差异,包括年龄,症状持续时间,功能评分,骨化后纵韧带与根管的最大占位率以及磁共振检查结果,如明显的脐带压痕的纵向范围和结扎程度。脊髓变平的程度。尽管两组患者的脐带扁平术后可改善程度相似,但前路手术显示出明显更好的功能结果(P <0.003),无神经系统并发症。相比之下,四名患者(33%)在手术后立即进行椎板成形术与神经系统严重恶化相关。结论:尽管在技术上要求更高,但是对于大型骨化的后纵韧带骨的前路显微外科减压术比椎板成形术更安全。为了更好地了解椎板成形术后神经功能恶化的潜在机制,不仅在手术期间,而且在患者术前定位期间,对脊髓和根部功能的电生理监测似乎都是必不可少的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号