首页> 外文期刊>Journal of spinal disorders & techniques. >An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty.
【24h】

An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty.

机译:后纵韧带骨化导致颈椎病患者手术效果差的因素分析:脊柱融合与椎板成形术减压。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: We compared the surgical outcome of anterior decompression with spinal fusion (ASF) with the surgical outcome of laminoplasty for patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. METHODS: The study group comprised 19 ASF patients (A-group) and 40 laminoplasty patients (P-group) treated from 1993 to 2002 with 1 year or longer follow-up. The Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system was used to evaluate cervical myelopathy, and the recovery rate calculated 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: The mean recovery rate was 68.4% in the A-group and 52.5% in the P-group (P<0.05). Fifteen patients had a recovery rate less than 40%: 2 in the A-group and 13 in the P-group. One P-group patient and none of the A-group patients developed postoperative aggravation of their neurologic status. The P-group was divided into 2 subgroups: a good outcome group comprising patients whose recovery rate was 40% or higher (n=27) and a poor outcome group comprising patients whose recovery rate was less than 40% (n=13). The mean age at surgery was 59.9 years in the good outcome group and 68.0 years in the poor outcome group (P<0.05). The mean range of intervertebral mobility at maximum cord compression level before surgery was 6.9 degrees in the good outcome group and 10 degrees in the poor outcome group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated that the surgical outcome of ASF was superior to the surgical outcome of laminoplasty. Elderly patients treated with laminoplasty showed an especially poor surgical outcome. We suggest that hypermobility of vertebrae at the cord compression level is a risk factor for poor surgical outcome after laminoplasty. Based on these results, we recommend that ASF should be the first choice of treatment for patients with significant ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and a hypermobile cervical spine. When laminoplasty is used for such cases, the addition of posterior instrumented fusion would be desirable for stabilizing thespine and decreasing damage to the spinal cord.
机译:目的:我们比较了由于后纵韧带骨化而导致颈椎病的前路减压加脊柱融合术(ASF)的手术效果与椎板成形术的手术效果。方法:研究组包括1993年至2002年接受1年或更长时间随访的19例ASF患者(A组)和40例椎板成形术患者(P组)。日本骨科协会评分系统用于评估颈椎病,术后1年计算恢复率。结果:A组平均恢复率为68.4%,P组平均恢复率为52.5%(P <0.05)。 15名患者的恢复率低于40%:A组2名,P组13名。一名P-组患者,没有一名A-组患者术后神经状况恶化。 P组分为两个亚组:一个好转归组,其康复率为40%或更高(n = 27);一个较差转归组,其康复率小于40%(n = 13)。良好结局组的平均手术年龄为59.9岁,较差结局组的平均手术年龄为68.0岁(P <0.05)。良好结局组在术前最大脊髓受压水平下椎间活动度的平均范围为6.9度,不良结局组为10度(P <0.05)。结论:这些结果表明,ASF的手术结果优于椎板成形术的手术结果。接受椎板成形术治疗的老年患者的手术结局特别差。我们建议在椎体压迫术后椎体过度活动是造成椎弓根成形术手术效果差的危险因素。根据这些结果,我们建议ASF应该是后纵韧带骨化明显且颈椎活动过度的患者的首选治疗方法。当将椎板成形术用于这种情况时,为了稳定脊柱并减少对脊髓的损伤,需要增加后路融合器械。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号