首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Clinical acceptance and accuracy assessment of spinal implants guided with SpineAssist surgical robot: retrospective study.
【24h】

Clinical acceptance and accuracy assessment of spinal implants guided with SpineAssist surgical robot: retrospective study.

机译:SpineAssist手术机器人引导的脊柱植入物的临床接受性和准确性评估:回顾性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, multicenter study of robotically-guided spinal implant insertions. Clinical acceptance of the implants was assessed by intraoperative radiograph, and when available, postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were used to determine placement accuracy. OBJECTIVE: To verify the clinical acceptance and accuracy of robotically-guided spinal implants and compare to those of unguided free-hand procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SpineAssist surgical robot has been used to guide implants and guide-wires to predefined locations in the spine. SpineAssist which, to the best of the authors' knowledge, is currently the sole robot providing surgical assistance in positioning tools in the spine, guided over 840 cases in 14 hospitals, between June 2005 and June 2009. METHODS: Clinical acceptance of 3271 pedicle screws and guide-wires inserted in 635 reported cases was assessed by intraoperative fluoroscopy, where placement accuracy of 646 pedicle screws inserted in 139 patients was measured using postoperative CT scans. RESULTS: Screw placements were found to be clinically acceptable in 98% of the cases when intraoperatively assessed by fluoroscopic images. Measurements derived from postoperative CT scans demonstrated that 98.3% of the screws fell within the safe zone, where 89.3% were completely within the pedicle and 9% breached the pedicle by up to 2 mm. The remaining 1.4% of the screws breached between 2 and 4 mm, while only 2 screws (0.3%) deviated by more than 4 mm from the pedicle wall. Neurologic deficits were observed in 4 cases yet, following revisions, no permanent nerve damage was encountered, in contrast to the 0.6% to 5% of neurologic damage reported in the literature. CONCLUSION: SpineAssist offers enhanced performance in spinal surgery when compared to free-hand surgeries, by increasing placement accuracy and reducing neurologic risks. In addition, 49% of the cases reported herein used a percutaneous approach, highlighting the contribution of SpineAssist in procedures without anatomic landmarks.
机译:研究设计:机器人引导的脊柱植入物插入的回顾性,多中心研究。通过术中X线照片评估植入物的临床接受度,并在可行时使用术后计算机断层摄影(CT)扫描来确定植入的准确性。目的:验证机器人引导的脊柱植入物的临床接受性和准确性,并与无引导的徒手程序进行比较。背景数据概述:SpineAssist外科手术机器人已被用于将植入物和导丝引导至脊柱中的预定位置。据作者所知,SpineAssist是目前唯一为脊柱定位工具提供外科手术帮助的机器人,在2005年6月至2009年6月间为14家医院的840例患者进行了手术。方法:临床接受了3271根椎弓根螺钉术中透视检查了635例病例中插入的导丝,并通过术后CT扫描测量了139例患者中646根椎弓根螺钉的放置精度。结果:在术中通过荧光镜检查评估的病例中,有98%的病例在临床上可接受螺钉置入。术后CT扫描得出的测量结果表明,98.3%的螺钉落在安全区内,其中89.3%的螺钉完全位于椎弓根内,9%的螺钉破坏了椎弓根长达2 mm。剩余的1.4%的螺钉在2至4毫米之间断裂,而只有2颗螺钉(0.3%)与椎弓根壁偏离超过4毫米。在4例患者中观察到神经功能缺损,但经过修订后,未遇到永久性神经损伤,而文献中报道的神经系统损伤为0.6%至5%。结论:与徒手手术相比,SpineAssist在脊柱外科手术中具有更高的性能,可提高放置准确性并降低神经系统风险。此外,本文报道的病例中有49%使用了经皮方法,突显了SpineAssist在无解剖标志的手术中的贡献。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号