首页> 外文期刊>South African Journal of Wildlife Research >Possible relationships between the South African captive-bred lion hunting industry and the hunting and conservation of lions elsewhere in Africa
【24h】

Possible relationships between the South African captive-bred lion hunting industry and the hunting and conservation of lions elsewhere in Africa

机译:南非圈养狮子狩猎业与非洲其他地方的狮子狩猎和养护之间的可能关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The trophy hunting of lions is contentious due to increasing evidence of impacts on wild populations, and ethical concerns surrounding the hunting of captive-bred lions in South Africa. The captive-bred lion hunting industry in South Africa has grown rapidly while the number of wild lions hunted in other African countries has declined. In 2009 and 2010, 833 and 682 lion trophies were exported from South Africa, respectively, more than double the combined export (2009, 471; 2010, 318) from other African countries. There has been an associated increase in the prevalence of the export of lion bones from South Africa: at least 645 bones/sets of bones were exported in 2010, 75.0% of which went to Asia. Such trade could be problematic if it stimulated demand for bones from wild lions or other wild felids. Captive-bred lion hunting differs from wild lion hunting in that lions are hunted in smaller areas (49.9 +/- 8.4 km(2) compared to 843 to 5933 km2, depending on the country), hunts are cheaper (US$20 000-40 000 compared to US$37 000-76 000 (excluding the costs of shooting other species and government charges]), shorter (3.3 compared to 14-21 days), success rates are higher (99.2% compared to 51.0-96.0%), and trophy quality is higher (skull length + breadth = 638.8 compared to 614-638 cm). Most clients perceive captive-bred and wild lion hunting to be different products but there is some overlap in markets: 48.7% of clients that had hunted captive-bred lions showed no preference regarding the type of future hunts. Owing to the size of the captive-bred hunting industry, even marginal overlap in demand could affect wild lion hunting significantly. If captive-bred lion hunting were ever prohibited, a transfer of demand to wild lion hunts could lead to elevated off-takes with negative impacts on wild populations. However, if off-takes of wild lions were held constant or reduced through effective regulation of quotas, increased demand could increase the price of wild lion hunts and strengthen financial incentives for lion conservation. These possibilities should be considered if future efforts are made to regulate captive-bred lion hunting.
机译:由于越来越多的证据表明对野生种群的影响,以及围绕狩猎南非圈养狮子的伦理问题,对狮子进行奖杯狩猎引起了争议。南非的圈养狮子狩猎业发展迅速,而在其他非洲国家/地区捕猎的野生狮子则有所减少。 2009年和2010年,南非分别出口了833座和682座狮子奖杯,是其他非洲国家出口总和的两倍(2009、471、2010、318)。从南非出口狮子骨的流行率也随之增加:2010年,至少出口了645骨/每套狮子,其中75.0%出口到亚洲。如果这种贸易刺激了野生狮子或其他野生猫科动物对骨头的需求,则可能会产生问题。圈养狮子狩猎与野生狮子狩猎的不同之处在于,狮子被捕猎的区域更小(49.9 +/- 8.4 km(2),相比之下,根据国家的不同,猎杀的狮子为843至5933 km2),狩猎的成本更低(2万至40美元) 000相比于37 000-76 000美元(不包括射击其他物种的费用和政府收费),更短(3.3比14-21天),成功率更高(99.2%比51.0-96.0%),以及奖杯质量更高(头骨长+宽= 638.8,而614-638厘米)大多数客户认为圈养和野生狮子狩猎是不同的产品,但市场上存在一些重叠:48.7%的客户曾捕获圈养和野生狮子繁殖狮子对未来的狩猎类型没有偏爱,由于圈养狩猎业的规模,即使需求的边际重叠也会极大地影响野生狮子的狩猎。如果曾经禁止圈养狮子狩猎,则需求转移狩猎野生狮子可能会导致承购量增加,负面影响不大在野生种群上。但是,如果通过有效地控制配额来保持或减少野生狮子的承购量,则需求增加可能会增加野生狮子狩猎的价格,并加强保护狮子的经济动力。如果将来做出努力来控制圈养狮子的狩猎,则应考虑这些可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号