首页> 外文期刊>Soil Biology & Biochemistry >Glomalin-related soil protein: assessment of current detection and quantification tools.
【24h】

Glomalin-related soil protein: assessment of current detection and quantification tools.

机译:glomalin相关的土壤蛋白:评估当前的检测和定量工具。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite the widely acknowledged importance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in soil ecology, quantifying their biomass and presence in field soils is hindered by tedious techniques. Hence biochemical markers may be useful, among which glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) could show a particular promise. Presently GRSP is operationally defined, its identification resting solely on the methods used to extract it from soil (citric acid buffer and autoclaving) and the assays (Bradford/enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a monoclonal antibody) utilized to detect it. The current assumption is that most non-heat stable soil proteins except glomalin are destroyed during the harsh extraction procedure. However, this critical assumption has not been tested. The purpose of this research was to challenge the GRSP extraction process to determine the accuracy of the Bradford method as a measure of glomalin; and to provide some assessment of the specificity of the ELISA monoclonal antibody. In two studies we spiked soil samples either with known quantities of a glycoprotein (BSA: bovine serum albumin) or with leaf litter from specific sources. After extraction 41-84% of the added BSA was detected with the Bradford method. This suggests that the currently used extraction procedure does not eliminate all non-glomalin proteins. Also, ELISA cross-reactivity against BSA was limited, ranging from 3% to 14%. Additions of leaf litter also significantly influenced GRSP extraction and quantification suggesting that plant-derived proteins, as would occur in the field, had a similar effect as BSA. Litter additions decreased the immunoreactive protein values, suggesting interference with antibody recognition. We conclude that the use of GRSP, especially Bradford-based detection, in the assessment of AMF-derived substances within field soils is problematic, it may be inappropriate in situations of significant organic matter additions..
机译:尽管广为人知的丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)在土壤生态学中的重要性,但繁琐的技术阻碍了量化其生物量和在田间土壤中的存在。因此,生化标记可能是有用的,其中与gloomalin相关的土壤蛋白(GRSP)可能显示出特殊的前景。目前对GRSP进行了操作定义,其鉴定完全取决于从土壤中提取它的方法(柠檬酸缓冲液和高压灭菌器)以及用于检测它的测定法(使用单克隆抗体的Bradford /酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA))。当前的假设是,在苛刻的提取过程中,除gloomalin外,大多数非热稳定的土壤蛋白质都会被破坏。但是,此关键假设尚未经过测试。这项研究的目的是挑战GRSP提取过程,以确定Bradford方法作为gloomalin量度的准确性。并对ELISA单克隆抗体的特异性提供一些评估。在两项研究中,我们用已知量的糖蛋白(BSA:牛血清白蛋白)或特定来源的叶子凋落物加标了土壤样品。提取后,用Bradford方法检测到41-84%的添加的BSA。这表明当前使用的提取程序并未消除所有非球蛋白。而且,针对BSA的ELISA交叉反应性受到限制,范围为3%至14%。叶子凋落物的添加也显着影响了GRSP的提取和定量,表明在田间发生的植物衍生蛋白质与BSA具有相似的作用。乱扔垃圾会降低免疫反应蛋白值,提示干扰抗体识别。我们得出结论,在评估田间土壤中AMF衍生物质时,使用GRSP(尤其是基于Bradford的检测)是有问题的,在大量添加有机物的情况下可能不合适。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号