首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Do time-invariant confounders explain away the association between job stress and workers' mental health?: Evidence from Japanese occupational panel data
【24h】

Do time-invariant confounders explain away the association between job stress and workers' mental health?: Evidence from Japanese occupational panel data

机译:时不变的混杂因素能解释工作压力和工人心理健康之间的关系吗?:来自日本职业小组数据的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

It is well known that job stress is negatively related to workers' mental health, but most recent studies have not controlled for unobserved time-invariant confounders. In the current study, we attempted to validate previous observations on the association between job stress and workers' mental health, by removing the effects of unobserved time-invariant confounders. We used data from three to four waves of an occupational Japanese cohort survey, focusing on 31,382 observations of 9741 individuals who participated in at least two consecutive waves. We estimated mean-centered fixed effects models to explain psychological distress in terms of the Kessler 6 (K6) scores (range: 0-24) by eight job stress indicators related to the job demands-control, effort-reward imbalance, and organizational injustice models. Mean-centered fixed effects models reduced the magnitude of the association between jobs stress and K6 scores to 44.8-54.2% of those observed from pooled ordinary least squares. However, the association remained highly significant even after controlling for unobserved time-invariant confounders for all job stress indicators. In addition, alternatively specified models showed the robustness of the results. In all, we concluded that the validity of major job stress models, which link job stress and workers' mental health, was robust, although unobserved time-invariant confounders led to an overestimation of the association. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:众所周知,工作压力与工人的心理健康负相关,但最近的研究并未控制未观察到的时不变混杂因素。在当前的研究中,我们试图通过消除未观察到的时不变混杂因素的影响来验证先前有关工作压力与工人心理健康之间关系的观察结果。我们使用了来自日本职业性队列调查的三至四次浪潮的数据,重点是对至少连续两次参加浪潮的9741个人的31,382次观察。我们估计了以均心为中心的固定效应模型,通过八个与工作需求控制,努力回报不平衡和组织不公正有关的工作压力指标,根据凯斯勒6(K6)得分(范围:0-24)来解释心理困扰。楷模。以均心为中心的固定效应模型将工作压力和K6得分之间的关​​联程度降低到了从合并的普通最小二乘法中观察到的结果的44.8-54.2%。然而,即使在所有工作压力指标都控制了未观察到的时不变混杂因素之后,该关联仍然具有很高的意义。此外,替代指定模型显示了结果的鲁棒性。总的来说,我们得出的结论是,将工作压力与工人的心理健康联系起来的主要工作压力模型的有效性很强,尽管未观察到的时不变混杂因素导致对该关联的估计过高。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号