...
首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >HIV prevention and marriage: Peer group effects on condom use acceptability in rural Kenya
【24h】

HIV prevention and marriage: Peer group effects on condom use acceptability in rural Kenya

机译:艾滋病毒的预防和婚姻:同伴群体对肯尼亚农村地区安全套使用可接受性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The twofold function of condom use - contraception and sexually transmitted disease protection -should be taken into account when understanding attitudes towards this practice. Emphasis on the interpretation of condom use as a protective practice conflicts with the norms of fidelity and trust, which regulate marriage. The alternative interpretation of condom use as a contraceptive method may be less problematic. This paper analyzes the extent to which the attitude of married men and women towards condom use with their spouses, and their actual use of condoms within marriage, are affected by their expectations about the dominant attitudes and behaviors in their peer group. I expect that a social consensus on understanding condom use as an HIV-preventive behavior will not make this practice more acceptable within marriage, while social acceptance of modern contraception and, more specifically, of the use of condoms for contraceptive purposes will. Two waves of a longitudinal survey from 1996 to 1999 in rural Kenya are analyzed using fixed-effects regression. Social support for each function of condom use is measured with indicators of the proportion of individuals in the peer group that use condoms for a particular purpose or have a positive attitude towards each of the uses, according to the respondent. The results support the hypothesis for men, but are inconclusive for women.
机译:在理解对安全套使用的双重态度时,应该考虑避孕和性传播疾病的保护。强调将安全套使用作为一种保护性行为的解释与规范婚姻的忠诚和信任规范相冲突。使用避孕套作为避孕方法的另一种解释可能没有太大问题。本文分析了已婚男女对配偶使用安全套的态度以及他们在婚姻中实际使用安全套的程度在多大程度上受到对同龄人群体主导性态度和行为的期望的影响。我希望,关于将避孕套理解为艾滋病毒预防行为的社会共识不会使这种习俗在婚姻中更容易被接受,而社会接受现代避孕方法,更具体地说,是出于避孕目的使用避孕套。使用固定效应回归分析了1996年至1999年肯尼亚农村地区的两次纵向调查。根据受访者的说法,对使用避孕套的每种功能的社会支持是通过衡量同龄人中出于特定目的使用避孕套或对每种用途持积极态度的个人比例的指标来衡量的。结果支持男性的假设,但对于女性没有定论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号