...
首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Obstacles to 'race equality' in the English National Health Service: Insights from the healthcare commissioning arena
【24h】

Obstacles to 'race equality' in the English National Health Service: Insights from the healthcare commissioning arena

机译:英格兰国家卫生局“竞赛平等”的障碍:医疗保健委托领域的见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Inequitable healthcare access, experiences and outcomes across ethnic groups are of concern across many countries. Progress on this agenda appears limited in England given the apparently strong legal and policy framework. This disjuncture raises questions about how central government policy is translated into local services. Healthcare commissioning organisations are a potentially powerful influence on services, but have rarely been examined from an equity perspective. We undertook a mixed method exploration of English Primary Care Trust (PCT) commissioning in 2010-12, to identify barriers and enablers to commissioning that addresses ethnic healthcare inequities, employing:- in-depth interviews with 19 national Key Informants; documentation of 10 good practice examples; detailed case studies of three PCTs (70+ interviews; extensive observational work and documentary analysis); three national stakeholder workshops. We found limited and patchy attention to ethnic diversity and inequity within English healthcare commissioning. Marginalization of this agenda, along with ambivalence, a lack of clarity and limited confidence, perpetuated a reinforcing inter-play between individual managers, their organisational setting and the wider policy context. Despite the apparent contrary indications, ethnic equity was a peripheral concern within national healthcare policy; poorly aligned with other more dominant agendas. Locally, consideration of ethnicity was often treated as a matter of legal compliance rather than integral to understanding and meeting healthcare needs. Many managers and teams did not consider tackling ethnic healthcare inequities to be part-and-parcel of their job, lacked confidence and skills to do so, and questioned the legitimacy of such work. Our findings indicate the need to enhance the skills, confidence and competence of individual managers and commissioning teams and to improve organizational structures and processes that support attention to ethnic inequity. Greater political will and clearer national direction is also required to produce the system change needed to embed action on ethnic inequity within healthcare commissioning. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
机译:跨种族群体之间不平等的医疗保健机会,经验和成果在许多国家中引起关注。鉴于明显的法律和政策框架,该议程在英格兰的进展似乎有限。这种分歧引发了关于中央政府政策如何转化为地方服务的疑问。医疗保健委托组织可能会对服务产生潜在的强大影响,但很少从公平的角度对其进行检查。我们在2010-12年对英语初级保健信托(PCT)委托进行了混合方法探索,以找出解决种族医疗保健不平等的障碍和推动者,方法是:-与19名国家主要信息提供者进行深入访谈;记录10个良好实践示例;对三个PCT的详细案例研究(70多次采访;广泛的观察工作和文献分析);三个国家利益相关者讲习班。我们发现在英国医疗保健委员会中,对种族多样性和不平等现象的关注有限且零星。该议程的边缘化,矛盾,缺乏明确性和有限的信心,使个体管理者,其组织机构和更广泛的政策环境之间的相互作用不断加剧。尽管有明显相反的迹象,但种族平等是国家医疗政策中的外围问题。与其他更占主导地位的议程不一致。在本地,对种族的考虑通常被视为法律合规性问题,而不是理解和满足医疗保健需求所不可或缺的。许多管理人员和团队不认为解决种族医疗保健不公平问题是其工作的一部分,缺乏信心和技巧来解决这些问题,并质疑这种工作的合法性。我们的发现表明,有必要提高个人经理和调试团队的技能,信心和能力,并改善支持关注种族不平等现象的组织结构和流程。还需要更大的政治意愿和更明确的国家方向,才能产生必要的制度变革,以将针对种族不平等的行动纳入医疗保健委托中。 (C)2016作者。由Elsevier Ltd.发布。这是CC BY-NC-ND许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)下的开放获取文章。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号