首页> 外文期刊>Sexually Transmitted Infections >Performance of the rapid plasma reagin and the rapid syphilis screening tests in the diagnosis of syphilis in field conditions in rural Africa.
【24h】

Performance of the rapid plasma reagin and the rapid syphilis screening tests in the diagnosis of syphilis in field conditions in rural Africa.

机译:快速血浆反应素和快速梅毒筛查试验在非洲农村田间条件下梅毒诊断中的性能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To assess the rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test performance in the field and to evaluate a new rapid syphilis test (RST) as a primary screen for syphilis. METHODS: 1325 women of reproductive age from rural communities in the Gambia were tested for syphilis seropositivity using a RPR 18 mm circle card and a RST strip. Within 1 week a repeat RPR and a TPHA test were carried out using standard techniques in the laboratory. RESULTS: Comparing field tests to a diagnosis of "active" syphilis defined as laboratory RPR and TPHA positive, the RPR test was 77.5% sensitive and 94.1% specific; the RST was 75.0% sensitive and 95.2% specific. The RST was easier to use and interpret than the RPR test especially where field conditions were difficult. In this setting with a low prevalence of syphilis in the community (3%), the chance of someone with a positive test being confirmed as having serologically active syphilis was less than 50% for both tests. CONCLUSIONS: The appropriateness of syphilis screening using RPR testing in antenatal clinics and health centres should be questioned if there is a low prevalence in the population, conditions for testing are poor, and resources limited. There is still an urgent need for an appropriate rapid syphilis test for field use.
机译:目的:评估该领域的快速血浆反应素(RPR)测试性能,并评估新的快速梅毒测试(RST)作为梅毒的主要筛查方法。方法:使用RPR 18 mm圆环卡和RST纸带对1325名来自冈比亚农村社区的育龄妇女进行梅毒血清阳性测试。在1周内,使用标准技术在实验室中进行了重复的RPR和TPHA测试。结果:将现场试验与诊断为实验室RPR和TPHA阳性的“活动性”梅毒的诊断进行比较,RPR试验的敏感度为77.5%,特异性为94.1%。 RST的敏感性为75.0%,特异性为95.2%。 RST比RPR测试更易于使用和解释,尤其是在野外条件困难的地方。在社区中梅毒患病率较低(3%)的情况下,两种检测均证实阳性检测者具有血清学活性梅毒的机会少于50%。结论:如果人群中的患病率低,检测条件差并且资源有限,应该质疑在产前诊所和卫生中心使用RPR检测进行梅毒筛查的适当性。迫切需要针对现场使用进行适当的梅毒快速检测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号