首页> 外文期刊>Sexually Transmitted Infections >Prospective, multi-centre clinic-based evaluation of four rapid diagnostic tests for syphilis.
【24h】

Prospective, multi-centre clinic-based evaluation of four rapid diagnostic tests for syphilis.

机译:基于前瞻性,基于多中心临床评估的梅毒的四种快速诊断检测。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate prospectively four rapid, point-of-care serological tests for syphilis in prenatal or high risk populations in four countries. METHODS: Tests were performed on consecutive clinic attenders, using whole blood in the clinic, and whole blood and serum in the laboratory. The sensitivity and specificity of each test was evaluated, using a standard treponemal test (Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay (TPHA) or fluorescent treponemal antibody, absorbed (FTA-ABS) as gold standard. Non-treponemal tests (rapid plasma reagin (RPR) or venereal diseases research laboratory (VDRL) tests) were also performed on all subjects at three sites. RESULTS: The specificity of each rapid test was >95% at each site. Sensitivities varied from 64-100% and, in most cases, were lower when whole blood was used rather than serum. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid serological tests for syphilis are an acceptable alternative to conventional laboratory tests. Since they do not require equipment or electricity, they couldincrease coverage of syphilis screening, and enable treatment to be given at the first clinic visit.
机译:目的:前瞻性评估四个国家在产前或高风险人群中梅毒的四种快速即时血清学检测。方法:对连续的临床服务员进行测试,使用诊所的全血以及实验室的全血和血清。评估每个测试的敏感性和特异性,使用标准的梅毒测试(梅毒螺旋体血凝试验(TPHA)或荧光性梅毒抗体)(FTA-ABS)作为金标准。结果还:在三个地点对所有受试者进行了性病研究实验室(VDRL)测试,结果:每个地点的每个快速测试的特异性均> 95%,敏感性从64%至100%不等,在大多数情况下较低结论:快速的梅毒血清学检查是常规实验室检查的一种可接受的替代方法,因为它们不需要设备或电力,因此可以增加梅毒筛查的覆盖率,并能在第一时间进行治疗门诊。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号