首页> 外文期刊>Sex roles >Patterns of Intimacy and Distancing as Young Women (and Men) Friends Exchange Stories of Romantic Relationships
【24h】

Patterns of Intimacy and Distancing as Young Women (and Men) Friends Exchange Stories of Romantic Relationships

机译:年轻男女朋友交流浪漫关系的故事时的亲密和疏离模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Heterosexual U. S. adolescents tend to show gender differences in how they describe romantic relationships, with males being positioned as cool and objectifying toward females, and females as warm and positively engaged (Simon et al. 1992; Tolman 2002). However, according to developmental theory (Arnett 2000, 2004), such gender scripts should be less operative in early adulthood, when romantic relationships become a prime concern for college-age youth regardless of gender. Partly confirming this premise, a recent study of male undergraduate friends in California found that during casual conversations, one of their most prevalent story telling patterns was shifting between positioning themselves as warm and engaged (intimate) and as cool and objectifying (distancing) toward romantic partners (Korobov and Thorne 2006). For purposes of a gender comparison, the present archival, mixed-methods study deployed the same methodology to examine the prevalence of these patterns for a companion college sample of 37 pairs of women friends. Gender differences were found for only one of four story patterns: Women friends told proportionately more stories than men that were mildly intimate. Otherwise the stories of both genders showed parallel patterns either of dense distancing, or of repeatedly shifting between intimacy and distancing. In addition, women and men friends showed a similar versatility in the array of patterns they produced. The findings suggest mild operability of a gendered intimacy script, but more generally support the premise that working out what one does and doesn't want in a romantic relationship is a common concern for young adult friends regardless of gender.
机译:美国异性恋青少年在描述浪漫关系时倾向于表现出性别差异,男性被定位为冷酷,对女性客观化,而女性则被定位为热情,积极投入的女性(Simon et al。1992; Tolman 2002)。但是,根据发展理论(Arnett,2000年,2004年),这种浪漫的性别脚本在成年初期应该不太有效,因为浪漫的关系成为不分性别的大学年龄青年的首要问题。在某种程度上证实了这一前提的一项最新研究是,在加利福尼亚对男大学生朋友进行的一次非正式对话中,他们最普遍的故事讲述模式之一是在将自己定位为温暖,参与(亲密),冷静和客观化(远离)之间走向浪漫。合作伙伴(Korobov和Thorne 2006)。为了进行性别比较,目前的档案学,混合方法研究采用了相同的方法,对37对女性朋友的大学伴侣样本检查了这些模式的普遍性。性别差异仅在四种故事模式中的一种中被发现:女性朋友讲的故事比男性中度亲密的故事多。否则,两个性别的故事都表现出平行的模式,要么密集疏远,要么在亲密和疏离之间反复转换。此外,男女朋友在所产生的图案中表现出相似的多功能性。研究结果表明,性别亲密脚本的可操作性很温和,但更普遍地支持这样一个前提,即在恋爱关系中确定一个人想要和不想要的内容是年轻成年朋友普遍关心的,而不论其性别如何。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号