首页> 外文期刊>Communication research >Deceptive Affection Across Relational Contexts: A Group Comparison of Romantic Relationships, Cross-Sex Friendships, and Friends With Benefits Relationships
【24h】

Deceptive Affection Across Relational Contexts: A Group Comparison of Romantic Relationships, Cross-Sex Friendships, and Friends With Benefits Relationships

机译:关系情境的欺骗性情感:浪漫关系,交叉性友谊和朋友关系的群体比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Communicating affection is important for developing and maintaining relationships; yet, it can be risky when it is used deceptively. Grounded in affection exchange theory (AET), the purpose of the present study is to test how types of deceptive affection-or incongruity between affection felt and expressed-predicts relational health differently across three relational contexts: romantic relationships (RRs), cross-sex friendships (CSFs), and friends with benefits relationships (FWBRs). Multiple group analyses using structural equation modeling (n = 526 college students) revealed varying relational types provide both intensified and withheld affection, with FWBRs experiencing both types of deceptive affection the most. Furthermore, intensified affection is positively related to relational health outcomes in RRs, and withheld affection negatively predicts relational health in FWBRs. Findings suggest that differences exist between relational types and both types of deceptive affection and relational health. Theoretical implications for expanding AET Postulates 3 and 5 are discussed.
机译:沟通情感对于发展和维持关系很重要;然而,在欺骗性地使用时可能存在危险。在深情的交流理论(AET)接地,目前研究的目的是测试情感之间如何欺骗情感 - 或不协调,在三个关系语境中不同地表达和表达 - 预测关系健康:浪漫关系(RRS),交叉性友谊(CSFS)和福利关系的朋友(FWBRS)。多组分析使用结构方程建模(n = 526名大学生)揭示了不同的关系类型,提供了加强和扣留的感情,FWBRS最多遇到两种类型的欺骗性情感。此外,加强的情感与RRS中的关系健康结果正相关,并拒绝了对FWBRS中的关系健康的影响。调查结果表明,关系类型和两种类型的欺骗情感和关系健康之间存在差异。讨论了扩展AET假设3和5的理论意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号