首页> 外文期刊>Seminars in perinatology >Scaling-up impact in perinatology through systems science: Bridging the collaboration and translational divides in cross-disciplinary research and public policy
【24h】

Scaling-up impact in perinatology through systems science: Bridging the collaboration and translational divides in cross-disciplinary research and public policy

机译:通过系统科学扩大围手术学的影响:弥合跨学科研究和公共政策中的协作和转化鸿沟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Despite progress over the past decade in reducing the global burden of newborn deaths, gaps in the knowledge base persist, and means of translating empirical findings into effective policies and programs that deliver life-saving interventions remain poorly understood. Articles in this issue highlight the relevance of transdisciplinary research in perinatology and calls for increased efforts to translate research into public policy and to integrate interventions into existing primary care delivery systems. Given the complexity and multi-causality of many of the remaining challenges in newborn health, and the effects that social and economic factors have over many newborn conditions, it has further been proposed that integrated, multi-sector public policies are also required. In this article, we discuss the application of systems science methods to advance transdisciplinary research and public policy-making in perinatology. Such approaches to research and public policy have been used to address various global challenges but have rarely been implemented in developing country settings. We propose that they hold great promise to improve not only our understanding of complex perinatology problems but can also help translate research-based insights into effective, multi-pronged solutions that deliver positive, intended effects. Examples of successful transdisciplinary science exist, but successes and failures are context specific, and there are no universal blueprints or formulae to reproduce what works in a specific context into different social system settings. Group model building is a tool, based in the field of System Dynamics, that we have used to facilitate transdisciplinary research and, to a lesser extent, policy formulation in a systematic and replicable way. In this article, we describe how group model building can be used and argue for scaling its use to further the translation of empirical evidence and insights into policy and action that increase maternal and neonatal survival and well-being. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:尽管过去十年来在减轻新生儿死亡的全球负担方面取得了进展,但知识库方面的差距仍然存在,将经验发现转化为有效的政策和计划以实施挽救生命的干预措施的方法仍然知之甚少。本期文章强调了跨学科研究在围手术学中的相关性,并呼吁加大力度将研究转化为公共政策,并将干预措施整合到现有的初级保健提供系统中。鉴于新生儿保健中许多尚存挑战的复杂性和多因果关系,以及社会和经济因素对许多新生儿状况的影响,因此进一步提出,还需要综合的多部门公共政策。在本文中,我们讨论了系统科学方法在推进跨学科研究和公共政策制定方面的应用。这种研究和公共政策方法已被用来应对各种全球性挑战,但很少在发展中国家实施。我们建议他们抱有很大的希望,不仅可以提高我们对复杂的围手术期问题的理解,而且还可以帮助将基于研究的见解转化为有效的,多管齐下的解决方案,以产生积极的预期效果。存在成功的跨学科科学的例子,但是成功和失败是特定于上下文的,并且没有通用的蓝图或公式可以将在特定上下文中起作用的内容复制到不同的社会系统环境中。组模型构建是基于系统动力学领域的工具,我们已使用它来促进跨学科研究,并在较小程度上以系统化和可复制的方式促进政策制定。在本文中,我们描述了如何使用群体模型构建,并提出了扩大其使用范围的主张,以进一步将经验证据和见解转化为可增加孕产妇和新生儿生存和福祉的政策和行动。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号