...
首页> 外文期刊>Cerebral cortex >Ongoing brain activity fluctuations directly account for intertrial and indirectly for intersubject variability in Stroop task performance.
【24h】

Ongoing brain activity fluctuations directly account for intertrial and indirectly for intersubject variability in Stroop task performance.

机译:持续的大脑活动波动直接导致了间质性,并间接导致了Stroop任务绩效中受试者间的变异性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Recent studies have established a relation between ongoing brain activity fluctuations and intertrial variability in evoked neural responses, perception, and motor performance. Here, we extended these investigations into the domain of cognitive control. Using functional neuroimaging and a sparse event-related design (with long and unpredictable intervals), we measured ongoing activity fluctuations and evoked responses in volunteers performing a Stroop task with color-word interference. Across trials, prestimulus activity of several regions predicted subsequent response speed and across subjects this effect scaled with the Stroop effect size, being significant only in subjects manifesting behavioral interference. These effects occurred only in task relevant as the dorsal anterior cingulate and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex as well as ventral visual areas sensitive to color and visual words. Crucially, in subjects showing a Stroop effect, reaction times were faster when prestimulus activity was higher in task-relevant (color) regions and slower when activity was higher in irrelevant (word form) regions. These findings suggest that intrinsic brain activity fluctuations modulate neural mechanisms underpinning selective voluntary attention and cognitive control. Rephrased in terms of predictive coding models, ongoing activity can hence be considered a proxy of the precision (gain) with which prediction error signals are transmitted upon sensory stimulation.
机译:最近的研究已经建立了持续的大脑活动波动和诱发的神经反应,知觉和运动表现之间的心房变异性之间的关系。在这里,我们将这些研究扩展到认知控制领域。使用功能性神经成像和稀疏事件相关的设计(具有较长且不可预测的时间间隔),我们测量了志愿者在执行带有色词干扰的Stroop任务的志愿者中持续的活动波动和诱发的反应。在所有试验中,几个区域的刺激活动预测了随后的反应速度,并且在整个受试者中,这种效应与Stroop效应的大小成比例,仅在表现出行为干扰的受试者中才有意义。这些影响仅发生在与背扣带和背外侧前额叶皮层以及对颜色和视觉词敏感的腹侧视觉区域相关的任务中。至关重要的是,在显示Stroop效应的受试者中,任务相关的(颜色)区域中的前刺激活动较高时,反应时间更快;而无关的(词形)区域中的活动中较高时,反应时间则较慢。这些发现表明内在的大脑活动波动调节了选择性自愿注意和认知控制的神经机制。用预测编码模型来表述,正在进行的活动因此可以被认为是精度(增益)的代理,在感官刺激下以该精度传递预测误差信号。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号