...
首页> 外文期刊>Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis >Different accuracies of rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent, turbidimetric, and agglutination d-dimer assays for thrombosis exclusion: impact on diagnostic work-ups of outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.
【24h】

Different accuracies of rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent, turbidimetric, and agglutination d-dimer assays for thrombosis exclusion: impact on diagnostic work-ups of outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

机译:快速酶联免疫吸附剂,比浊法和凝集性d-二聚体测定法对血栓形成排除的不同准确性:对怀疑有深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞的门诊诊断工作的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The requirement for a safe diagnostic strategy should be based on an overall posttest incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) of less than 1%, with a negative predictive value of more than 99 to 100% during 3-month follow-up. Compression ultrasonography (CUS) and spiral computed tomography (CT) currently are the methods of choice to confirm or rule out deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), respectively. CUS has a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97 to 98%, indicating the need to improve the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected DVT by clinical score assessment and D-dimer testing. Spiral CT as a stand-alone method detects all clinically relevant PEs and a large number of alternative diagnoses. It rules out PE with a NPV of 98 to 99%. Spiral CT is expensive, emphasizing the need to improve the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected PE by the use of clinical score assessment and D-dimer testing. Clinical score assessment for DVT and PE has not safely ruled out VTE in multicenter studies and in routine daily practices. Modification of the Wells clinical score assessment for DVT by elimination of the "minus 2 points" for alternative diagnosis will improve the reproducibility of the clinical score assessment. The combination of a first negative CUS and a negative SimpliRed or an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) VIDAS D-dimer of < 1,000 ng/mL safely exclude DVT (NPV > 99%) irrespective of clinical score assessment and without the need to repeat CUS in approximately 60 to 70% of patients. The rapid quantitative and qualitative agglutination D-dimer assays for the exclusion of VTE are not sensitive enough as stand-alone tests and should be used in combination with clinical score assessment. A normal rapid ELISA VIDAS D-dimer test as a stand-alone test safely excludes DVT and PE, with a NPV of 99 to 100%, irrespective of clinical score, without the need of CUS or spiral CT. The combined strategy of a rapid ELISA VIDAS D-dimer followed by objective testing with CUS for DVT and by spiral CT for PE will reduce the need for noninvasive imaging techniques by 40 to 50%.
机译:安全诊断策略的要求应基于静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的总体测试后发生率小于1%,在3个月的随访期间阴性预测值大于99至100%。压缩超声检查(CUS)和螺旋计算机断层扫描(CT)当前是分别确认或排除深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和肺栓塞(PE)的选择方法。 CUS的阴性预测值(NPV)为97%到98%,这表明需要通过临床评分评估和D-二聚体测试来改善DVT可疑患者的诊断水平。螺旋CT作为一种独立方法,可以检测所有临床相关的PE和大量其他诊断。它排除了NPV为98至99%的PE。螺旋CT昂贵,强调需要通过临床评分评估和D-二聚体检测来改善可疑PE患者的诊断检查。 DVT和PE的临床评分评估尚未在多中心研究和常规日常实践中安全地排除VTE。通过消除“负2分”进行替代诊断来修改DVT的Wells临床评分评估,将提高临床评分评估的可重复性。首次CUS阴性和SimpliRed阴性或酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)VIDAS D-二聚体<1,000 ng / mL的组合可安全排除DVT(NPV> 99%),而无需进行临床评分评估,并且无需在大约60%至70%的患者中重复进行CUS。排除VTE的快速定量和定性凝集D-二聚体测定作为独立测试不够灵敏,应与临床评分评估结合使用。普通的快速ELISA VIDAS D-二聚体测试作为独立测试可以安全地排除DVT和PE,无论临床评分如何,其NPV均为99%至100%,而无需CUS或螺旋CT。快速ELISA VIDAS D-二聚体的组合策略,然后用CUS对DVT进行客观测试,对PE用螺旋CT进行客观测试,将使无创成像技术的需求减少40%至50%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号