...
首页> 外文期刊>Seminars in ophthalmology >Ranibizumab (Lucentis) versus Bevacizumab (Avastin) for the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: An Economic Disparity of Eye Health
【24h】

Ranibizumab (Lucentis) versus Bevacizumab (Avastin) for the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: An Economic Disparity of Eye Health

机译:雷尼单抗(Lucentis)与贝伐单抗(Avastin)治疗与年龄相关的黄斑变性:眼睛健康的经济差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness in the elderly, and the advent of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents (VEGF) has revolutionized treatment for neovascular AMD. Two of the most popular anti-VEGF agents, ranibizumab (Lucentis; Genentech/Roche) and bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech/Roche), effectively treat neovascular AMD but have a substantial difference in price. Multiple level 1 trials have demonstrated that bevacizumab is noninferior to ranibizumab in the treatment of neovascular AMD and that both have similar safety profiles. The decision to use one drug over the other is multifactorial with influences from industry as well as individual physician biases. However, the additional billions spent on ranibizumab result in a large economic disparity that is not rationalized by cost effectiveness models.
机译:年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)是老年人失明的主要原因,抗血管内皮生长因子药物(VEGF)的出现彻底改变了新血管AMD的治疗方法。两种最受欢迎​​的抗VEGF药物兰尼单抗(Lucentis; Genentech / Roche)和贝伐单抗(Avastin; Genentech / Roche)有效治疗新生血管性AMD,但价格差异很大。多项1级试验表明,贝伐单抗在治疗新生血管AMD方面不逊于兰尼单抗,并且两者的安全性相似。使用一种药物而不是另一种药物的决定是多方面的,受到行业以及医生个人偏见的影响。但是,在兰尼单抗上花费的额外数十亿美元导致了巨大的经济差异,而成本效益模型并未将其合理化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号