首页> 外文期刊>Seizure: the journal of the British Epilepsy Association >Acute neonatal encephalopathy and seizures recurrence: A combined aEEG/EEG study
【24h】

Acute neonatal encephalopathy and seizures recurrence: A combined aEEG/EEG study

机译:急性新生儿脑病和癫痫发作复发:aEEG / EEG联合研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose To evaluate amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG) in comparison with conventional (cEEG) for the identification of electrographic seizures in neonates with acute neonatal encephalopathies. Methods Thirty-one conventional cEEG/aEEG long-term recordings from twenty-eight newborns were reviewed in order to assess the electrographic seizure detection rate and recurrence in newborns. Two paediatric neurologists and one neonatologist, blinded to the raw full array cEEG, were asked to mark any events suspected to be an electrographic seizures on aEEG. They were asked to decide if the displayed aEEG trace showed the pattern of a single seizure (SS), repetitive seizures (RS) or status epilepticus (SE). Their ability to recognize electrographic seizures on aEEG was compared to seizures identified on full array cEEG. Results 25 of the 31 long-term cEEGs recordings showed electrographic seizures. The two paediatric neurologists and the neonatologist identified SE in 100% of the reviewed traces using aEEG alone while they identified 49.4% and 37.5% of electrographic seizures using aEEG alone. Overall, the correct identification ranged from 23.5% to 30.7% for SS and 66% for RS. The inter-observer agreement (k) for the identification of SE for the two paediatric neurologists and the neonatologist was 1.0. Overall the inter-observer agreement (k) for the detection of SS, RS and SE of the two paediatric neurologists was 0.91. Conclusions In our study the observers identified SE in 100% of the reviewed traces using raw aEEG alone, thus aEEG might represent a useful tool to detect SE in the setting of NICU. SS may not be reliably identified using aEEG alone. Simultaneous recording of the raw cEEG/aEEG provides a good level of sensitivity for the detection of neonatal electrographic seizures.
机译:目的与常规(cEEG)相比,对振幅积分EEG(aEEG)进行评估,以鉴定患有急性新生儿脑病的新生儿的电图发作。方法回顾性分析了28例新生儿的31例常规cEEG / aEEG长期记录,以评估新生儿的电子癫痫发作检出率和复发率。两名儿童神经科医生和一名新生儿科医生对原始的全阵列cEEG视而不见,被要求在aEEG上标记任何怀疑是电子病发作的事件。他们被要求决定显示的aEEG轨迹是否显示单次发作(SS),重复发作(RS)或癫痫持续状态(SE)的模式。将他们在aEEG上识别电子癫痫发作的能力与在全阵列cEEG上识别的癫痫发作进行了比较。结果31例长期cEEG记录中有25例显示出电图发作。两名儿科神经科医生和新生儿科医生仅使用aEEG就在100%的回顾性迹线中确定了SE,而仅使用aEEG便确定了49.4%和37.5%的电图发作。总体而言,SS的正确识别范围为23.5%至30.7%,RS的正确识别范围为66%。两位儿科神经科医生和新生儿科医生用于识别SE的观察员之间的协议(k)为1.0。总体而言,两名小儿神经科医师用于检测SS,RS和SE的观察者间协议(k)为0.91。结论在我们的研究中,观察者仅使用原始的aEEG就可以在100%的审查痕迹中鉴定出SE,因此aEEG可能代表了在重症监护病房中检测SE的有用工具。单独使用aEEG可能无法可靠地识别SS。原始cEEG / aEEG的同时记录为检测新生儿电图惊厥提供了良好的灵敏度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号