首页> 外文期刊>Seizure: the journal of the British Epilepsy Association >Vagal nerve stimulation: relationship between outcome and electroclinical seizure pattern.
【24h】

Vagal nerve stimulation: relationship between outcome and electroclinical seizure pattern.

机译:迷走神经刺激:转归与临床癫痫发作模式之间的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In recent years, vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) has been proposed as a possible way to improve the control of refractory (partial and generalized) seizures. To date, however, there is no complete understanding of the underlying mechanism for this action nor are there any available guidelines or criteria for the selection of those candidates that might be most suitable for this kind of neuromodulating surgery. This report presents evidence that should be helpful in defining the clinical criteria for using VNS for the treatment of refractory seizures. We report on 17 patients with severe partial refractory epilepsy and polymorphous seizures, who have been operated on previously or who were excluded from epilepsy surgery and for whom, at least, one seizure type has been electrographically recorded. Sixteen of these patients also had falling seizures. Our objective was to identify responders and to correlate the outcome of their seizures with the EEGraphic onset of their seizure. Follow-up ranged from 4 to 9 years. The results of this study indicate a significant reduction of seizures in only four patients and better outcome in patients where the onset of seizure activity occurred in the temporal area. Patients with frontal or frontocentral seizures resulted in the poorest outcomes. In four patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome VNS produced no significant reduction of seizures, while falling seizures decreased significantly in three patients with retropulsive falls. These results of this small series of patients suggest that VNS might be more suitable in patients with temporal rather than frontal or central seizure onset. Further studies are required to support this hypothesis.
机译:近年来,迷走神经刺激(VNS)已被提议作为改善难治性(部分和全身性)癫痫发作控制的一种可能方法。然而,迄今为止,尚未完全了解该动作的潜在机制,也没有任何可用的指南或标准来选择那些最适合这种神经调节手术的候选人。该报告提供了有助于确定使用VNS治疗难治性癫痫发作的临床标准的证据。我们报告了17例严重的部分难治性癫痫和多形性癫痫发作的患者,这些患者先前曾接受过手术或被癫痫外科手术排除,并且至少通过电子照相记录了一种癫痫发作类型。这些患者中有十六名也有癫痫发作。我们的目标是确定反应者,并将其癫痫发作的结果与癫痫发作的EEGraphic相关联。随访时间为4到9年。这项研究的结果表明,只有四名患者的癫痫发作显着减少,而在颞部发作活动开始的患者的预后更好。额部或额中部癫痫发作的患者预后最差。在四名Lennox-Gastaut综合征患者中,VNS并没有使癫痫发作显着减少,而在三名具有后倾性跌倒的患者中,下降性癫痫发作明显减少。这一小系列患者的这些结果表明,VNS可能更适合于颞部发作而不是额部或中枢性发作的患者。需要进一步的研究来支持这一假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号