首页> 外文期刊>Seizure: the journal of the British Epilepsy Association >Epilepsy in Rett syndrome: association between phenotype and genotype, and implications for practice.
【24h】

Epilepsy in Rett syndrome: association between phenotype and genotype, and implications for practice.

机译:Rett综合征的癫痫:表型和基因型之间的关联,以及对实践的启示。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between genotype (methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2 gene mutation)) and epileptic seizure phenotype in Rett syndrome. METHODS: We used the British Isles Rett syndrome survey to identify 137 subjects with one of the nine most frequent MECP2 gene mutations and invited their parents or carers to participate in a postal questionnaire and telephone interview. The questionnaire recorded information about epileptic seizure types, non-epileptic vacant spells and treatments. Two investigators conducted telephone interviews and three epileptologists classified their epileptic seizures. RESULTS: 89 subjects (65%) responded. The epilepsy prevalence was 67%, and 74% had non-epileptic vacant spells. The epilepsy prevalence within specific genotypes ranged from 47% (mutation C-terminal deletion, downstream of the Transcription Repression Domain) to 100% (mutation p.R270X, c.808C>T). The prevalence of non-epileptic vacant spells within genotypes ranged from 50% (mutation p.R306C, c.916C>T) to 100% (mutation p.R106W, c.316C>T). The epileptologists differed considerably in their classification of events, particularly of non-epileptic vacant spells. CONCLUSIONS: The large majority of people with Rett syndrome have epilepsy. Most have multiple epileptic seizure types, although generalised tonic-clonic seizures are the most common. There were no significant clinical differences between genotypes. The clinical differentiation of non-epileptic vacant spells is difficult. Discordance in epileptic seizure classification between clinicians suggests that caution is needed, since the clinical history alone cannot adequately classify the epileptic seizure type in Rett syndrome.
机译:目的:探讨雷特综合征的基因型(甲基CpG结合蛋白2(MECP2基因突变))与癫痫发作表型之间的关系。方法:我们使用不列颠群岛瑞特综合征调查确定了137个受试者,这些受试者具有9个最常见的MECP2基因突变之一,并邀请其父母或护理人员参加邮政问卷和电话采访。问卷记录了有关癫痫发作类型,非癫痫发作空位和治疗方法的信息。两名调查员进行了电话采访,三名癫痫学家对他们的癫痫发作进行了分类。结果:89名受试者(65%)有效。癫痫患病率为67%,其中74%为非癫痫性空病。特定基因型中的癫痫患病率从47%(突变C端缺失,转录抑制域的下游)到100%(突变p.R270X,c.808C> T)不等。基因型中非癫痫性空虚的发生率从50%(突变p.R306C,c.916C> T)到100%(突变p.R106W,c.316C> T)。癫痫学家对事件的分类存在很大差异,尤其是对非癫痫性空虚事件的分类。结论:雷特综合征的大多数人患有癫痫病。大多数患者有多种癫痫发作类型,尽管最常见的是全身性强直阵挛性癫痫发作。基因型之间没有明显的临床差异。非癫痫发作空缺法的临床区分很困难。临床医生之间的癫痫发作分类不一致表明需要谨慎,因为仅凭临床病史无法对Rett综合征的癫痫发作类型进行充分分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号